June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
How did it go for YOU, Mikey??TheMikey wrote:So how is everyone feeling??? How did it go for my fellow June group buddies??
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:20 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Disagree, but I also think that having fake RC---> real RC fucked with my momentum.Alive97 wrote:Confirmed the fake RC had a comparative reading about chemistry. The fake RC was much harder than the real RC IMO.
- Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at allproteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
WOMP!!!ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
Any two LR people have movie producers?
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:00 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had LG-LR-RC-RC-LRsomethingElse wrote:How did it go for YOU, Mikey??TheMikey wrote:So how is everyone feeling??? How did it go for my fellow June group buddies??
Back to back RC, my worst LSAT nightmare right next to a 140. LRs were ok, not too bad. RCs, fuck them, that's all I will say

- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.Smallville wrote:eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at allproteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
-
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Same. Was overconfident coming out of the break and my last 2 sections were much harder( real RC and 26 LR).acidwash wrote:Disagree, but I also think that having fake RC---> real RC fucked with my momentum.Alive97 wrote:Confirmed the fake RC had a comparative reading about chemistry. The fake RC was much harder than the real RC IMO.
- sluggla
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:12 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had 25-26-25 LR. I thought my first 25 was extremely hard and the other two were a breeze.
RC seemed pretty par for the course. It wasn't anything different than the past couple years of RC.
LG was fine but still mildly annoying. I felt like it was fairly straight forward but a giant time suck of brute forcing.
All in all I'm not angry at this test. Granted my post-test pizza coma is helping.
RC seemed pretty par for the course. It wasn't anything different than the past couple years of RC.
LG was fine but still mildly annoying. I felt like it was fairly straight forward but a giant time suck of brute forcing.
All in all I'm not angry at this test. Granted my post-test pizza coma is helping.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- appind
- Posts: 2266
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Smallville wrote:eh I disagree, Id say it may be close if it were LR as that has the most common problem of people being stuck on certain problems and using time struggling to figure out 1 or 2 questions but for some people who are a little slower at LG 2 minutes could easily mean 2 questions and same with RC, 2 minutes is a lot of timeappind wrote: also even if you had like 50 people in a room only 2-3 among them will be at a percentile level where minutes or seconds make difference. vast majority of test takers don't care but that doesnt excuse proctor stupidity.
yeah, I mean those 2mins could matter to a whole lotta people, but very few are in a position to say something. that is, being able to open up this conversation with the time keeping proctor in the last few minutes under a very stressful situation requires confidence, poise, guts, desire for a high score etc that may be more common amongst the top takers than the vast majority.
i'd def eff up if cheated out of those 2 mins and be batshit.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Three LR's and two RC's back to back are just terrible tests. Was hoping for two LG's.
- Smallville
- Posts: 4825
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
you sir(or ma'am) are crazy, props for the dedication, but crazyproteinshake wrote:I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.Smallville wrote:eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at allproteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
-
- Posts: 1881
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Had a bitchin hard "match my fuck up" Q right before. Took up the whole damn page with its bullshit.somewhatferal wrote:Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
Any two LR people have movie producers?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah I only had 2 LR and don't remember seeing this questionsomewhatferal wrote:I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
- dvc5240
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:26 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Same. Missed 2 on game 2, but other than that easy.audaz wrote:Thought it was overall pretty easy... I for sure missed onelouis48089 wrote:For those who usually go -1/0 on LG, did you think LG was run of the mill?realized on the drive home why
- somethingElse
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Dude quality of school has almost nothing to do with how the test is going to go, lol. It matters way more which specific room it's in and the proctors you have. Also others' recent reviews of the place (which it looks like your place has, so good idea then).
Last edited by somethingElse on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Yeah, that was the worst. I had 2 minutes to go starting on the second to last question, and I somehow ran out of time before getting to the last question.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Had a bitchin hard "match my fuck up" Q right before. Took up the whole damn page with its bullshit.somewhatferal wrote:Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
Any two LR people have movie producers?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
You should've seen my face after the break when I got to section 4 and it was another damn RC.somewhatferal wrote:Three LR's and two RC's back to back are just terrible tests. Was hoping for two LG's.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:00 am
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
Christ. There are definitely two experimental LRs then. What about a question about 300/5000 people answering a survey?somewhatferal wrote:I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
Last edited by dinizdeoliveira on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
to be fair people have said that it's a terrible testing center. one person said that phones went of multiple times because of a flood warning and the proctors didn't even do anything. I'm trying to dodge that at ALL costs!!!Smallville wrote:you sir(or ma'am) are crazy, props for the dedication, but crazyproteinshake wrote:I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.Smallville wrote:eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at allproteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
edit: I'm getting a hotel so it's not like I'm driving 2.5 hours on test day
- dodint
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)
I had the African Weaver RC and this Movie Producers LR (the one about new technology), and understand the African Weaver to be an Experimental RC.ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!
LR LG LR LR LC here.
As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!
WOMP!!!!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login