June 2016 - Waiter's (+170 or bust) GRAY DAY HAS AWOKEN FROM ITS SLUMBER Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply

WHATS THE FUCKING CURVE

-11
21
21%
wats a curve
8
8%
-10
5
5%
-11
16
16%
-15
4
4%
-7
6
6%
JOSÉ CURVE-O
33
33%
-12
8
8%
 
Total votes: 101

User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by proteinshake » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:10 pm

quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somethingElse » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:10 pm

TheMikey wrote:So how is everyone feeling??? How did it go for my fellow June group buddies??
How did it go for YOU, Mikey??

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:11 pm

Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!

acidwash

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2015 11:20 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by acidwash » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:11 pm

Alive97 wrote:Confirmed the fake RC had a comparative reading about chemistry. The fake RC was much harder than the real RC IMO.
Disagree, but I also think that having fake RC---> real RC fucked with my momentum.

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:11 pm

proteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at all

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somethingElse » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:12 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!
WOMP!!!

somewhatferal

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somewhatferal » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:12 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!
Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.

Any two LR people have movie producers?

dinizdeoliveira

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:00 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by dinizdeoliveira » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:13 pm

Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.

Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:13 pm

somethingElse wrote:
TheMikey wrote:So how is everyone feeling??? How did it go for my fellow June group buddies??
How did it go for YOU, Mikey??
I had LG-LR-RC-RC-LR

Back to back RC, my worst LSAT nightmare right next to a 140. LRs were ok, not too bad. RCs, fuck them, that's all I will say :( LG was decent but unfortunately didn't get to finish a game.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by proteinshake » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:14 pm

Smallville wrote:
proteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at all
I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.

somewhatferal

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somewhatferal » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:14 pm

dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.

CPA-->JD

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 12:30 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by CPA-->JD » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:15 pm

acidwash wrote:
Alive97 wrote:Confirmed the fake RC had a comparative reading about chemistry. The fake RC was much harder than the real RC IMO.
Disagree, but I also think that having fake RC---> real RC fucked with my momentum.
Same. Was overconfident coming out of the break and my last 2 sections were much harder( real RC and 26 LR).

User avatar
sluggla

Bronze
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:12 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by sluggla » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:15 pm

I had 25-26-25 LR. I thought my first 25 was extremely hard and the other two were a breeze.

RC seemed pretty par for the course. It wasn't anything different than the past couple years of RC.

LG was fine but still mildly annoying. I felt like it was fairly straight forward but a giant time suck of brute forcing.

All in all I'm not angry at this test. Granted my post-test pizza coma is helping.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by appind » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:15 pm

Smallville wrote:
appind wrote: also even if you had like 50 people in a room only 2-3 among them will be at a percentile level where minutes or seconds make difference. vast majority of test takers don't care but that doesnt excuse proctor stupidity.
eh I disagree, Id say it may be close if it were LR as that has the most common problem of people being stuck on certain problems and using time struggling to figure out 1 or 2 questions but for some people who are a little slower at LG 2 minutes could easily mean 2 questions and same with RC, 2 minutes is a lot of time

yeah, I mean those 2mins could matter to a whole lotta people, but very few are in a position to say something. that is, being able to open up this conversation with the time keeping proctor in the last few minutes under a very stressful situation requires confidence, poise, guts, desire for a high score etc that may be more common amongst the top takers than the vast majority.

i'd def eff up if cheated out of those 2 mins and be batshit.

somewhatferal

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somewhatferal » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:15 pm

Three LR's and two RC's back to back are just terrible tests. Was hoping for two LG's.

User avatar
Smallville

Gold
Posts: 4825
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Smallville » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:15 pm

proteinshake wrote:
Smallville wrote:
proteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at all
I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.
you sir(or ma'am) are crazy, props for the dedication, but crazy

ponderingmeerkat

Gold
Posts: 1881
Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 11:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by ponderingmeerkat » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:16 pm

somewhatferal wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!
Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.

Any two LR people have movie producers?
Had a bitchin hard "match my fuck up" Q right before. Took up the whole damn page with its bullshit.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:16 pm

somewhatferal wrote:
dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.
Yeah I only had 2 LR and don't remember seeing this question

User avatar
dvc5240

New
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:26 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by dvc5240 » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:16 pm

audaz wrote:
louis48089 wrote:For those who usually go -1/0 on LG, did you think LG was run of the mill?
Thought it was overall pretty easy... I for sure missed one :cry: realized on the drive home why
Same. Missed 2 on game 2, but other than that easy.

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somethingElse » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:17 pm

Dude quality of school has almost nothing to do with how the test is going to go, lol. It matters way more which specific room it's in and the proctors you have. Also others' recent reviews of the place (which it looks like your place has, so good idea then).
Last edited by somethingElse on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:20 pm, edited 2 times in total.

somewhatferal

New
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:24 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by somewhatferal » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:17 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:
somewhatferal wrote:
ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!
Glad to see someone agrees with my assessment.

Any two LR people have movie producers?
Had a bitchin hard "match my fuck up" Q right before. Took up the whole damn page with its bullshit.
Yeah, that was the worst. I had 2 minutes to go starting on the second to last question, and I somehow ran out of time before getting to the last question.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Mikey

Platinum
Posts: 8046
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by Mikey » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:17 pm

somewhatferal wrote:Three LR's and two RC's back to back are just terrible tests. Was hoping for two LG's.
You should've seen my face after the break when I got to section 4 and it was another damn RC.

dinizdeoliveira

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 10:00 am

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by dinizdeoliveira » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:18 pm

somewhatferal wrote:
dinizdeoliveira wrote:Anyone with 2 LRs recall a reasoning question with Ellie enjoying chemistry classes? It was on my third LR.
I had three LR's and I don't remember this question.
Christ. There are definitely two experimental LRs then. What about a question about 300/5000 people answering a survey?
Last edited by dinizdeoliveira on Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
proteinshake

Gold
Posts: 4643
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by proteinshake » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:18 pm

Smallville wrote:
proteinshake wrote:
Smallville wrote:
proteinshake wrote:quality of testing center is definitely causally correlated with prestige of the institution.
eh I took at a TTT and TT and both were pretty solid, not sure if either beats the other by a whole lot if at all
I'm taking the September test at a university 2.5 hours away from me to avoid taking it at a for-profit law school.
you sir(or ma'am) are crazy, props for the dedication, but crazy
to be fair people have said that it's a terrible testing center. one person said that phones went of multiple times because of a flood warning and the proctors didn't even do anything. I'm trying to dodge that at ALL costs!!!

edit: I'm getting a hotel so it's not like I'm driving 2.5 hours on test day

User avatar
dodint

Bronze
Posts: 187
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:47 pm

Re: June 2016 - Waiter's Thread (+170 or bust)

Post by dodint » Mon Jun 06, 2016 7:23 pm

ponderingmeerkat wrote:Well well well! Hello fellow waiters!

LR LG LR LR LC here.

As has been previously stated, one LR was madness. The rest of the test pretty standard IMO. Hoping the hard LR was experimental. (Movie producers was last Q.) Glad the storm didnt hit Miami!!

WOMP!!!!
I had the African Weaver RC and this Movie Producers LR (the one about new technology), and understand the African Weaver to be an Experimental RC.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”