Nah, he's definitely a drug dealer. For sure no doubt about it.proteinshake wrote:let me rephrase: he PROBABLY isn't a drug dealer since he's a cop. better?
The Official September 2016 Study Group - WAKE ME UP WHEN SEPTEMBER ENDS Forum
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
That's fantastic. Sounds like you're killing those drills. Great job!!34iplaw wrote:Finished first part...off to grab lunch and delve into games. I think the latter half of my schedule may have been ambitious, but, as of now, I'm 78/80 on this HW's MBT [20 to go] and -1 on the first 15 passages. These were focused on accuracy rather than speed.
I was a little hesitant on posting this and getting trucked by the last 3 passages and last 20 MBT.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e3b/50e3b5fa19e84a1f707c48a9b4247df83a8b0415" alt="Very Happy :D"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e3b/50e3b5fa19e84a1f707c48a9b4247df83a8b0415" alt="Very Happy :D"
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
TheMikey wrote:Nah, he's definitely a drug dealer. For sure no doubt about it.proteinshake wrote:let me rephrase: he PROBABLY isn't a drug dealer since he's a cop. better?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63e74/63e740587392bebce8e8a482d9257929723a4142" alt="Image"
I hope yall get this reference
- Deardevil
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Man Mikey that really sucks D: praying that won't be the case too; although I think my biggest fear is 3 lr sections in a row.TheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
Glad you agree, Deardevil! I mean I'm not planning on *winging* RC and I'll be doing plenty of drilling, but my RC avg is currently the same as my lr avg (-2/-3) - lr is worth more and , from my understanding, much more systematic / easy improve than RC; and I bombed RC on the last two PTs for the same very obvious reason - running out of time, because I was in a shit mental state. And tbh I know if I do no RC at all now until September (which is def NOT the plan) I'll still do okay, because I won't forget how to read. Ignoring lg would be a very, very different story
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d39c/9d39c814df68eae6885f4e2f9731d6c7dcb77bcf" alt="Laughing :lol:"
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Yeah, 2 RC sections back to back was really mind draining for me. I felt like my experimental was really hard too. On top of being nervous, it was a terrible time lol.Alexandros wrote: Man Mikey that really sucks D: praying that won't be the case too; although I think my biggest fear is 3 lr sections in a row.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Thanks. Well, the last twenty most certainly went worse. All questions missed were in the 22-25 range of questions.Alexandros wrote:That's fantastic. Sounds like you're killing those drills. Great job!!34iplaw wrote:Finished first part...off to grab lunch and delve into games. I think the latter half of my schedule may have been ambitious, but, as of now, I'm 78/80 on this HW's MBT [20 to go] and -1 on the first 15 passages. These were focused on accuracy rather than speed.
I was a little hesitant on posting this and getting trucked by the last 3 passages and last 20 MBT.Downright inspiring.
Need to go over in particular a question on milk bottlers (eliminated right answer), bacteria and hydrogen sulfide (picked between right and a wrong answer - picked wrong), why scientists have an astounding success rate (eliminated right answer), scientific laws (picked right answer but wasn't sure as to how strong my reasoning was to eliminate), and one on feudalism.
Out of the 100 MBT, I got 94/100 correct. All six missed I wasn't certain about, and four were questions in that end of section area. I had 12 questions (including the six wrong) that I had *some* question about. Mostly for word definitions to double check and verify my reasoning for picking one of two choices being solid. Overall, fairly happy. I do wish the last 20 went better.
Going to do some games and maybe RC later, but I think my mind is a bit fatigued from that last section of 20 challenging LR questions.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Yeah RC sucks so much, I hate it. I'd honestly trade the RC section for an LR section that contains all tough questions. Im probably exaggerating but I truly despise RC, like seriously when I saw that my following section was another RC, I smiled not because I was happy, but because I was like "oh yeah? Ok LSAC, fuck you fuckers fuck".34iplaw wrote:That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
I dunno. I feel like LR is like 25 short RC passages without continuity. Saying this makes me realize I may have a problem in how I approach LR.TheMikey wrote:Yeah RC sucks so much, I hate it. I'd honestly trade the RC section for an LR section that contains all tough questions. Im probably exaggerating but I truly despise RC, like seriously when I saw that my following section was another RC, I smiled not because I was happy, but because I was like "oh yeah? Ok LSAC, fuck you fuckers fuck".34iplaw wrote:That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Well yeah, they're just a bunch of small passages I guess. I still prefer LR over RC, lol.34iplaw wrote:I dunno. I feel like LR is like 25 short RC passages without continuity. Saying this makes me realize I may have a problem in how I approach LR.TheMikey wrote:Yeah RC sucks so much, I hate it. I'd honestly trade the RC section for an LR section that contains all tough questions. Im probably exaggerating but I truly despise RC, like seriously when I saw that my following section was another RC, I smiled not because I was happy, but because I was like "oh yeah? Ok LSAC, fuck you fuckers fuck".34iplaw wrote:That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
- tsf
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:23 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
I can only see my score and percentile, which sucks, because I can't be certain about my weaknessesTheMikey wrote:Under your score, you don't see your scantron, response report, PDFs of the sections, etc? If not then I have no clue.tsf wrote:Checking in!
I took the June exam and got a score well below my average, let's see what ~3 more months of studying can do!
Love the posts from this thread, please keep them coming
P.S. Do any of you know if there's a way to get access to the june test booklet? I took it in another country, so I have no idea what my raw score was or which questions I got wrong... I was hoping to do it again to see if I could notice some of my mistakes. Would I be able to buy it as a PT anytime soon?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae81e/ae81e176c677d5b58de6b1b745a274300289fe5f" alt="Sad :("
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tsf
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:23 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Barack O'Drama wrote:Howdy tsf!tsf wrote:Checking in!
I took the June exam and got a score well below my average, let's see what ~3 more months of studying can do!
Love the posts from this thread, please keep them coming
P.S. Do any of you know if there's a way to get access to the june test booklet? I took it in another country, so I have no idea what my raw score was or which questions I got wrong... I was hoping to do it again to see if I could notice some of my mistakes. Would I be able to buy it as a PT anytime soon?
Glad to see you are not settling and achieving what you know you are capable of!
I'm not sure how to access the test or when it will be released (or if it is already somewhere on the depths of the internet?) I'm sure someone on here will know...
Anyways, I'm confident with a few more months you'll come back hard and kill it in September!
Thanks for the motivation, Barack O'Drama (awesome username btw hahaha)!
I hope so too
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be12b/be12b57ce2afce8936fe6bc03910f337ad762f8c" alt="Smile :)"
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
I can never drill right after reading a chapter out of a prep book. My brain is too tired afterward so I usually save the drills for the next day or later on.
-
- Posts: 8046
- Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 5:24 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Really? What I do with the 7sage lessons is go through them and then maybe like an hour later I drill. But it's probably more draining to read through lessons compared to seeing them.proteinshake wrote:I can never drill right after reading a chapter out of a prep book. My brain is too tired afterward so I usually save the drills for the next day or later on.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
hm it might be cause it's later in the day. usually when I start in the morning I can go for 3 hours straight so I guess this applies if I'm studying in the afternoon/evening.TheMikey wrote:Really? What I do with the 7sage lessons is go through them and then maybe like an hour later I drill. But it's probably more draining to read through lessons compared to seeing them.proteinshake wrote:I can never drill right after reading a chapter out of a prep book. My brain is too tired afterward so I usually save the drills for the next day or later on.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Barack O'Drama
- Posts: 3272
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:21 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
proteinshake wrote:I can never drill right after reading a chapter out of a prep book. My brain is too tired afterward so I usually save the drills for the next day or later on.
Same. Just read the first 2 chapters of Manhattan LR and was going to drill some assumption type questions, did about 10, then I realized my brain just wasn't working properly. I guess it is going to have to wait until later...
Last edited by Barack O'Drama on Fri Jan 26, 2018 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- 34iplaw
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2016 2:55 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Finished RC. Not as strongly as I'd like but I attribute that slightly to mental fatigue from the day and some general sloppiness.
Summary for RC HW
7/7 Oct '94 #14-20
6/6 June '93 #1-6
7/8 Dec '04 #7-14
6/6 Oct '10 #1-6
5/5 June '04 #1-5
8/8 Sep '95 #1-8
5/5 Dec '91 #16-20
8/8 Feb '92 #21-27
6/6 Dec '97 #1-6
7/7 Feb '00 #21-27
7/7 Dec '92 #1-7
8/8 June '96 #1-8
7/7 June '93 #7-13
8/8 Dec '02 #9-16
6/6 Dec '95 #16-21
7/8 Dec '06 #21-28 (felt this passage was hard. Missed 22 because of assertion vs observation. Didn't really feel there was that much difference between three cited statements where if one wasn't an assertion that the other two weren't)
4/7 Feb '95 #7-13 (really not sure what happened here. I think there was one line in the passage that really screwed me over. #8, #11, and #12. #12 was a bad mistake that was a carry over from #8. #8 and #11 bother me a little. I think I need to have certain definitional things more clear in my head.)
6/6 Oct '03 #21-26
Overall, 118/123 if I added that up right across 18 passages. Not really happy from that one Feb '95 passage but am otherwise pleased.
Summary for RC HW
7/7 Oct '94 #14-20
6/6 June '93 #1-6
7/8 Dec '04 #7-14
6/6 Oct '10 #1-6
5/5 June '04 #1-5
8/8 Sep '95 #1-8
5/5 Dec '91 #16-20
8/8 Feb '92 #21-27
6/6 Dec '97 #1-6
7/7 Feb '00 #21-27
7/7 Dec '92 #1-7
8/8 June '96 #1-8
7/7 June '93 #7-13
8/8 Dec '02 #9-16
6/6 Dec '95 #16-21
7/8 Dec '06 #21-28 (felt this passage was hard. Missed 22 because of assertion vs observation. Didn't really feel there was that much difference between three cited statements where if one wasn't an assertion that the other two weren't)
4/7 Feb '95 #7-13 (really not sure what happened here. I think there was one line in the passage that really screwed me over. #8, #11, and #12. #12 was a bad mistake that was a carry over from #8. #8 and #11 bother me a little. I think I need to have certain definitional things more clear in my head.)
6/6 Oct '03 #21-26
Overall, 118/123 if I added that up right across 18 passages. Not really happy from that one Feb '95 passage but am otherwise pleased.
- proteinshake
- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
yeah and the fact that the end of the chapter is basically a drill makes me less-inclined to drill more right after.Barack O'Drama wrote:proteinshake wrote:I can never drill right after reading a chapter out of a prep book. My brain is too tired afterward so I usually save the drills for the next day or later on.
Same. Just read the first 2 chapters of Manhattan LR and was going to drill some assumption type questions, did about 10, then I realized my brain just wasn't working properly. I guess it is going to have to wait until later...
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
That sounds absolutely nightmarish D: I feel like RC is, more than the other two, the section rendered the most difficult by nervousness/ distraction / crap mental state. You're not 100% or your mind wanders for a couple seconds, and bam you're reading half the passage over again.TheMikey wrote:Yeah, 2 RC sections back to back was really mind draining for me. I felt like my experimental was really hard too. On top of being nervous, it was a terrible time lol.Alexandros wrote: Man Mikey that really sucks D: praying that won't be the case too; although I think my biggest fear is 3 lr sections in a row.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
I did get to the point where I actually kind of liked LR once (aside from diagnostic, where everything's a relief compared to logic games.) I'm afraid our relationship's fallen apart though :/TheMikey wrote:Well yeah, they're just a bunch of small passages I guess. I still prefer LR over RC, lol.34iplaw wrote:I dunno. I feel like LR is like 25 short RC passages without continuity. Saying this makes me realize I may have a problem in how I approach LR.TheMikey wrote:Yeah RC sucks so much, I hate it. I'd honestly trade the RC section for an LR section that contains all tough questions. Im probably exaggerating but I truly despise RC, like seriously when I saw that my following section was another RC, I smiled not because I was happy, but because I was like "oh yeah? Ok LSAC, fuck you fuckers fuck".34iplaw wrote:That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.Alexandros wrote:Screw it. aside from continuing to do regular RC drilling, I'm going to worry about that section later. Getting LR and LG to zeros, because I know I can. RC will hopefully come. not going to freak out about RC at the expense of the other 3/4 of the test, not worth it.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
LR - this isn't over. I will appreciate you yet, damn it.
Last edited by Alexandros on Sun Jul 03, 2016 6:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6478
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:46 am
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Those are some killer scores! Are you doing them timed?34iplaw wrote:Thanks. Well, the last twenty most certainly went worse. All questions missed were in the 22-25 range of questions.Alexandros wrote:That's fantastic. Sounds like you're killing those drills. Great job!!34iplaw wrote:Finished first part...off to grab lunch and delve into games. I think the latter half of my schedule may have been ambitious, but, as of now, I'm 78/80 on this HW's MBT [20 to go] and -1 on the first 15 passages. These were focused on accuracy rather than speed.
I was a little hesitant on posting this and getting trucked by the last 3 passages and last 20 MBT.Downright inspiring.
Need to go over in particular a question on milk bottlers (eliminated right answer), bacteria and hydrogen sulfide (picked between right and a wrong answer - picked wrong), why scientists have an astounding success rate (eliminated right answer), scientific laws (picked right answer but wasn't sure as to how strong my reasoning was to eliminate), and one on feudalism.
Out of the 100 MBT, I got 94/100 correct. All six missed I wasn't certain about, and four were questions in that end of section area. I had 12 questions (including the six wrong) that I had *some* question about. Mostly for word definitions to double check and verify my reasoning for picking one of two choices being solid. Overall, fairly happy. I do wish the last 20 went better.
Going to do some games and maybe RC later, but I think my mind is a bit fatigued from that last section of 20 challenging LR questions.
Realizing MBT/inference/supported by is a weak area for me - always feel a bit unfamiliar and show up surprisingly frequently. I've only done type training to the scale of ~20 qs/type. You're motivating me to get some serious by type drilling in when my books arrive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/50e3b/50e3b5fa19e84a1f707c48a9b4247df83a8b0415" alt="Very Happy :D"
- YupSports
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sun Jun 28, 2015 5:45 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Did the 7Sage principle and Method of Reasoning sections today.
Did fairly well.
Now, off to the bar!
Did fairly well.
Now, off to the bar!
- Deardevil
- Posts: 496
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: The Official September 2016 Study Group - WELCOME JUNE WAITERS
Aside from the ridiculously worded stimuli and occasionally tricky ACs, LR isn't so bad (certainly much better than RC).Alexandros wrote:I did get to the point where I actually kind of liked LR once (aside from diagnostic, where everything's a relief compared to logic games.) I'm our relationship's fallen apart though :/TheMikey wrote:Well yeah, they're just a bunch of small passages I guess. I still prefer LR over RC, lol.34iplaw wrote:I dunno. I feel like LR is like 25 short RC passages without continuity. Saying this makes me realize I may have a problem in how I approach LR.TheMikey wrote:Yeah RC sucks so much, I hate it. I'd honestly trade the RC section for an LR section that contains all tough questions. Im probably exaggerating but I truly despise RC, like seriously when I saw that my following section was another RC, I smiled not because I was happy, but because I was like "oh yeah? Ok LSAC, fuck you fuckers fuck".34iplaw wrote:That sounds terrible. On my diagnostic, I had a RC I was pretty happy with and got a second one. It was actually demoralizing for some reason. Luckily, the first was the one that counts. I'm still fairly convinced that the experimental section had answer choices reordered from when it was actually administered. I really can't imagine that I did that poorlyTheMikey wrote:I had an RC experimental the section before real RC. Sucked major ass lolDeardevil wrote:Yup! As long as you get the others perfect, especially LR, it's only 25+ questions you really have to worry about.
Unless the testers are cruel and decide to make RC the fifth section... Ugh; praying that's not the case. PLEASE BE LG.
LR - this isn't over. I will appreciate you yet, damn it.
I've come to see the section as a fusion of analytical reasoning and reading comprehension, as someone had mentioned;
questions can be either fun/easy or dense/frustrating like their respective LG and RC counterparts.
Got through PrepTest B's LR today for the second time;
ecstatic I got everything right, though a timed first-time tomorrow will really determine things at this point.
*breathes heavy sigh of relief and anxiousness*
Also, quote pyramid ftw.
ETA: Oh, you can only quote a maximum of seven? BORING.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login