Mercy From LSAC? Forum
-
LitigatingLiar

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Mercy From LSAC?
What's this trend for the mid 60's PTs to give us all this room on LG? We barely had any room before and I remember one test where there was literally no room to diagram because it was like 8 or 9 questions?
-
SamuelDanforth

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 5:05 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!
- RZ5646

- Posts: 2391
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2014 1:31 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
- Clearly

- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Thats why you do your diagram on the right page, so that once you finish the acceptability question you don't have to look back.RZ5646 wrote:Personally, after practicing on old tests, I thought the extra space was distracting and a time waster, since you have to look back and forth a greater distance.
-
LitigatingLiar

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:25 pm
Re: Mercy From LSAC?
Oh, I'm not complaining. I like the extra room. I'm just curious as to what prompted it. As I said above, there were some tests where there was no room. They usually find ways to make things harder on us, not easier.SamuelDanforth wrote:I'm confused as to what your question is. Starting in the mid to late 60s they introduced a different layout so as to provide more work space. That's how it has been formatted on all subsequent tests. It's much better!