real The Official December 2016 Waiters Group - Patience is a Virtue Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
alpha kenny body

Gold
Posts: 4850
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by alpha kenny body » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:13 pm

legirl12le wrote:
Pozzo wrote:Hey company buildings, fuck you.

West coast just wrapped. Overall impression: easier than Sept, especially RC. LG was harder for sure. Realized I missed a key (easy) inference on game 3, which sucked up my time. Realized on the second to the last question on game 4, that there's a HUGE inference that unlocks the game, but it was too late. LR seemed pretty on par from recent PTs. My score is all wrapped up in those games. I legit put myself anywhere 170-180.

LR-RC-LR-LG-LR
-which LR section did you think was experimental? I had the same LR-RC-LR-LG-LR order
I had the same, and I believe it was the second one that was the experimental section. It was the hardest of the three.

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Pozzo » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:17 pm

bearedman8 wrote:West Coast back and checking in. :)

Wow, I'm shocked at how easy I felt like everything was. I'm getting over a cold so I've been a bit groggy and I definitely didn't feel like I was there 100% today, but the exam honestly felt like a -10 curve to me.
-10 sounds about right, especially given that Sept was just -12. Had a hard time with LG, but I think that's on me, not necessarily the difficulty.

legirl12le

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 5:55 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by legirl12le » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:19 pm

fips tedora wrote:
legirl12le wrote:
Pozzo wrote:Hey company buildings, fuck you.

West coast just wrapped. Overall impression: easier than Sept, especially RC. LG was harder for sure. Realized I missed a key (easy) inference on game 3, which sucked up my time. Realized on the second to the last question on game 4, that there's a HUGE inference that unlocks the game, but it was too late. LR seemed pretty on par from recent PTs. My score is all wrapped up in those games. I legit put myself anywhere 170-180.

LR-RC-LR-LG-LR
-which LR section did you think was experimental? I had the same LR-RC-LR-LG-LR order
I had the same, and I believe it was the second one that was the experimental section. It was the hardest of the three.
-without too much detail, any identifying factors of the experimental LR section? our order within the sections could've been swapped too

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Pozzo » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:20 pm

fips tedora wrote:
legirl12le wrote:
Pozzo wrote:Hey company buildings, fuck you.

West coast just wrapped. Overall impression: easier than Sept, especially RC. LG was harder for sure. Realized I missed a key (easy) inference on game 3, which sucked up my time. Realized on the second to the last question on game 4, that there's a HUGE inference that unlocks the game, but it was too late. LR seemed pretty on par from recent PTs. My score is all wrapped up in those games. I legit put myself anywhere 170-180.

LR-RC-LR-LG-LR
-which LR section did you think was experimental? I had the same LR-RC-LR-LG-LR order
I had the same, and I believe it was the second one that was the experimental section. It was the hardest of the three.
Looking at the powerscore forums for real questions now. Looks like 1 and 3 were real for me.

User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:28 pm

I thought I did well on LR this time, but I thought the same thing back in Sept and went -11 so idk. I didn't even freak out on the fourth game, I just didn't have time to give it my full thought because game three siphoned a lot of time away. Also the first question on the last game took more time to work through than I think most questions of that type normally do.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:34 pm

Also, where are the homies
amta wrote:
and
cherrygalore wrote:

brewpub16

New
Posts: 43
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:30 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by brewpub16 » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:36 pm

Checking in. Trying to figure out which LR was experimental. Would someone who didn't have LR experimental tell me if they had a stimulus on (a) octopuses choosing red balls or (b)a tickling machine inducing laughter. Also, game 4, HAH. Game 3 was a massive time sink. RC was relatively OK.

User avatar
prospectivepigeon

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:31 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by prospectivepigeon » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:36 pm

Hi I am hoping to take the September/October 2017 LSAT. It seems from this test that there were some who were caught by surprise by logic games at the end before the essay. Is this the experimental section?? If not, what are ways to prepare for the logic games that were seen on this test???

User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:38 pm

brewpub16 wrote:Checking in. Trying to figure out which LR was experimental. Would someone who didn't have LR experimental tell me if they had a stimulus on (a) octopuses choosing red balls or (b)a tickling machine inducing laughter. Also, game 4, HAH. Game 3 was a massive time sink. RC was relatively OK.
I don't remember seeing either of those questions (I had an experimental LG).

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
bearedman8

Bronze
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by bearedman8 » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:38 pm

brewpub16 wrote:Checking in. Trying to figure out which LR was experimental. Would someone who didn't have LR experimental tell me if they had a stimulus on (a) octopuses choosing red balls or (b)a tickling machine inducing laughter. Also, game 4, HAH. Game 3 was a massive time sink. RC was relatively OK.
Those were definitely experimental.

User avatar
dontsaywhatyoumean

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:35 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by dontsaywhatyoumean » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:40 pm

Instrumental wrote:
brewpub16 wrote:Checking in. Trying to figure out which LR was experimental. Would someone who didn't have LR experimental tell me if they had a stimulus on (a) octopuses choosing red balls or (b)a tickling machine inducing laughter. Also, game 4, HAH. Game 3 was a massive time sink. RC was relatively OK.
I don't remember seeing either of those questions (I had an experimental LG).
I had experimental LR and I don't remember either of those questions LOL.

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Pozzo » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:42 pm

Image

User avatar
bearedman8

Bronze
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by bearedman8 » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:43 pm

dontsaywhatyoumean wrote:
Instrumental wrote:
brewpub16 wrote:Checking in. Trying to figure out which LR was experimental. Would someone who didn't have LR experimental tell me if they had a stimulus on (a) octopuses choosing red balls or (b)a tickling machine inducing laughter. Also, game 4, HAH. Game 3 was a massive time sink. RC was relatively OK.
I don't remember seeing either of those questions (I had an experimental LG).
I had experimental LR and I don't remember either of those questions LOL.
Not everyone has the same experimental section. I remember for the September exam I had an experimental RC that was different than what a bunch of other people had. (And I would know if I was mistaken, given that one of my exp passages was what I did my undergraduate thesis about).

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


jdanz

Bronze
Posts: 206
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:48 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by jdanz » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:43 pm

Am I the only one who thought LR was actually hard

User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:44 pm

prospectivepigeon wrote:Hi I am hoping to take the September/October 2017 LSAT. It seems from this test that there were some who were caught by surprise by logic games at the end before the essay. Is this the experimental section?? If not, what are ways to prepare for the logic games that were seen on this test???
The game people are stressed about was not an experimental section. LSAT has begun to make the last game a bit off kilter from the norm. Not sure there is a most effective way to prepare for it beyond making sure you're really good at sequence and grouping games so you can breeze through those and have enough time to handle the odd ball games. For the virus game and this one, I think they make the questions a little easier to compensate for the odd scenarios, but still it can be difficult just because it's new and you may be low on time if one of the games is a time sink (as game 3 was this time around).

User avatar
prospectivepigeon

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:31 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by prospectivepigeon » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:44 pm

were the buildings or real estate question and art hanging on the wall questions part of experimental logic games?

User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:45 pm

Pozzo wrote:Image
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
bearedman8

Bronze
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by bearedman8 » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:47 pm

prospectivepigeon wrote:were the buildings or real estate question and art hanging on the wall questions part of experimental logic games?
That was the real games section.

My experimental games section ended with musicians. The real one ended with the buildings.

User avatar
prospectivepigeon

New
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:31 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by prospectivepigeon » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:48 pm

How does one know which of the two logic games is the experimental one?

User avatar
alpha kenny body

Gold
Posts: 4850
Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by alpha kenny body » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:51 pm

I ended up finishing all 4 games, yet the 4th was the hardest. RC was easier than expected, and I enjoyed the passages. LR wasn't too hard either. The curve won't be more than -11.

aguilareal

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:21 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by aguilareal » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:51 pm

International test centre check in!
Completely different test (thank god, that LG section seemed rough) but still had the same writing sample ;) #teambrewery

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
Instrumental

Silver
Posts: 1393
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:08 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Instrumental » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:51 pm

prospectivepigeon wrote:How does one know which of the two logic games is the experimental one?
The experimental section is usually (always?) in the first half of the exam. Also it is usually easier and has broken questions (pretty sure I ran into a question with multiple correct answers in the experimental LG, but maybe not).

User avatar
Law2020hopeful

New
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 10:36 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by Law2020hopeful » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:52 pm

prospectivepigeon wrote:How does one know which of the two logic games is the experimental one?
Because people have different experimental sections. I had two RC sections so I know the LG sections with the buildings, paintings and mystery clues is the real one.

User avatar
bearedman8

Bronze
Posts: 315
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 3:43 am

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by bearedman8 » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:56 pm

prospectivepigeon wrote:How does one know which of the two logic games is the experimental one?
It's impossible to tell until after the exam is over. Every LSAT will always have the following sections, in variable order, a reading comprehension, analytical reasoning (logic games), two logical reasoning, and one experimental. The experimental can be any of the other three sections.

So if you have 2 logic games sections, you know that one of them was experimental but you don't know what one (or 2 rcs, or 3 LRs). Everyone has the same sections (although in a jumbled order) except for the experimental, so you can find out afterwards which was experimental because other people won't have taken it.

So I had RC > LR > LG > LR > LG, so I know that LG was my experimental and I see here that the 1st LG was experimental because everyone had the 2nd LG set.

https://www.powerscore.com/lsat/help/experimental.cfm

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: The Official December 2016 Waiters Group

Post by amta » Sat Dec 03, 2016 6:59 pm

Instrumental wrote:Also, where are the homies
amta wrote:
and
cherrygalore wrote:
west coast mayne. im out. had experimental lg and girl next to me was having a very audible panic attack through sections 1 and 2. calling a 166

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”