PT 36 Sec-3 #14 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

PT 36 Sec-3 #14

Post by ltowns1 » Fri Jul 31, 2015 10:23 pm

I have a question about the correct answer. Why is it that (C) is correct since we must look for a unstated premise that must be true? (C) talks about what technology "experts" use instead of what our main piece of evidence talks about which is the technology "nonexperts" use

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Post removed...

Post by somethingElse » Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:26 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by somethingElse on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Re: PT 36 Sec-3 #14

Post by ltowns1 » Sat Aug 01, 2015 3:04 pm

Any information helps, thanks for your reply

joewoo198256

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:28 am

Re: PT 36 Sec-3 #14

Post by joewoo198256 » Wed Aug 19, 2015 11:36 pm

You have to capture the argument here: because most machines are designed for non-expert, so we don't need to educate our student with technological expertise for tomorrow's job market. So the premise is crystal clear here, it assumes tomorrow's job market doesn't need people with expertise regarding inner knowledge of machines, but what if it does? this is a loophole we have to plug in. The assumption here functions as a bullet-proof.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”