3-2-4 LR Must Be True Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

3-2-4 LR Must Be True

Post by ltowns1 » Fri Jul 24, 2015 11:33 am

So not understanding this question from a conditional standpoint. It seems like the right answers makes a mistaken negation??

User avatar
somethingElse

Gold
Posts: 4007
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2015 1:09 pm

Post removed...

Post by somethingElse » Fri Jul 24, 2015 3:13 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by somethingElse on Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:47 am, edited 1 time in total.

joewoo198256

New
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:28 am

Re: 3-2-4 LR Must Be True

Post by joewoo198256 » Thu Aug 20, 2015 3:59 am

Using DeMorgan's law: from the premise we have If A and B then C; the contrapositive is If not C then Not A or Not B; Put it in the argument here: If inviting and functional, then it must be not obtrusive; the contrapositive is if it is obtrusive, then it must be not inviting or not functional.\

From the premise we know the modern architects's work is not functional, then it must be obtrusive, which is exactly what choice B saying.

Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”