Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
RubberCheeseBall

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 1:50 pm

Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by RubberCheeseBall » Wed Jul 01, 2015 2:05 pm

I'm working through the powerscore LG bible and am wondering how some of you quickly spot and label the "randoms" for a game? At first I wasn't labeling them because it was just taking too much time for me to look through all rules to see what variables were used and what weren't, but I've been burned too many times now on practice LG because I didn't identify the random.

Anyone have any recommendations for a super quick process to label the randoms?

User avatar
Clemenceau

Silver
Posts: 940
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 11:33 am

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by Clemenceau » Wed Jul 01, 2015 2:09 pm

Like, floaters? Pieces that aren't affected by any of the rules? I think I just circled them

User avatar
KMart

Gold
Posts: 4369
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 1:25 am

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by KMart » Wed Jul 01, 2015 2:11 pm

How are you setting it up? I just kind of had it as a result of how I diagrammed the rules.

User avatar
mornincounselor

Silver
Posts: 1236
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Post by mornincounselor » Wed Jul 01, 2015 3:51 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LifeGoals

New
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 12:36 am

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by LifeGoals » Wed Jul 01, 2015 10:09 pm

Typically after writing out the rules I rewrite the first letter of every variable in the game, setting off any randoms to the side. I also sometimes draw a double arrow to note symetrical variables (i.e., what is true for one must be true for the other.)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
jetsfan1

Silver
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by jetsfan1 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 8:35 am

I would always initially write out the letters of all the variables and as I read through each rule and diagrammed it would cross out the affected variable (lightly though, so you can still see/use it). Then at the end you already have your floaters, and I'd put a star above them.

It doesn't matter if you do it this way, but I think it's pretty essential to know your floaters going into the questions.

npt2901

New
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 9:37 pm

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by npt2901 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 9:50 am

Clemenceau wrote:Like, floaters? Pieces that aren't affected by any of the rules? I think I just circled them
^^ Me too

Manhattan Prep Matt

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 2:56 pm

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by Manhattan Prep Matt » Thu Jul 02, 2015 10:22 am

jetsfan1 wrote:I would always initially write out the letters of all the variables and as I read through each rule and diagrammed it would cross out the affected variable (lightly though, so you can still see/use it).
I do something similar, although I put a dot above of the letters as they come up in the rules. If you have no dots, you're a stray, and I circle you. If you show up in more than one rule, you get more than one dot. This also lets me see which elements are very restricted and likely to lead to inferences, as they'll have multiple dots.

User avatar
jetsfan1

Silver
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:14 pm

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by jetsfan1 » Thu Jul 02, 2015 3:44 pm

Manhattan Prep Matt wrote:
jetsfan1 wrote:I would always initially write out the letters of all the variables and as I read through each rule and diagrammed it would cross out the affected variable (lightly though, so you can still see/use it).
I do something similar, although I put a dot above of the letters as they come up in the rules. If you have no dots, you're a stray, and I circle you. If you show up in more than one rule, you get more than one dot. This also lets me see which elements are very restricted and likely to lead to inferences, as they'll have multiple dots.
Ooooo I like that double dot for double rule variables. I would always just keep them in my head and it worked to a certain extent but this seems much better.

User avatar
RubberCheeseBall

New
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2015 1:50 pm

Re: Quickly labeling "randoms" in LG

Post by RubberCheeseBall » Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:10 pm

Manhattan Prep Matt wrote:
jetsfan1 wrote:I would always initially write out the letters of all the variables and as I read through each rule and diagrammed it would cross out the affected variable (lightly though, so you can still see/use it).
I do something similar, although I put a dot above of the letters as they come up in the rules. If you have no dots, you're a stray, and I circle you. If you show up in more than one rule, you get more than one dot. This also lets me see which elements are very restricted and likely to lead to inferences, as they'll have multiple dots.
Oh wow I like this method! Thumbs up

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”