Manhattan vs Trainer Forum

[Shcamz]

Hey guys I'm doing both bibles and was wondering if you guys think I should get the Trainer or Manhattan LR/LG books to pair along with the bibles? Possibly both? And work through them all together? I can pretty much devote most of my day to LSAT studying so it's okay if I need to spend an extra few hours going through different books.

I really appreciate any advice, this forum as helped me immensely already.

~Shcamz

[Fred Norris]

You said it yourself. you have unlimited (virtually) study time. Do both. Both are excellent.

[Shcamz]

You said it yourself. you have unlimited (virtually) study time. Do both. Both are excellent.

Should I do them all at the same time? Or what do you suggest?

[PoopNpants]

You said it yourself. you have unlimited (virtually) study time. Do both. Both are excellent.

Should I do them all at the same time? Or what do you suggest?

Trainer first, then the bibles. Not sure about the Manhattan books I havent used them but generally people speak positively about them

[Shcamz]

You said it yourself. you have unlimited (virtually) study time. Do both. Both are excellent.

Should I do them all at the same time? Or what do you suggest?

Trainer first, then the bibles. Not sure about the Manhattan books I havent used them but generally people speak positively about them

Thanks man!

When should I implement the Cambridge packets then?

[Shcamz]

I'm going to run through the bibles first (already half way done actually with each) and then grind through the Trainer with the Manhattan LR book/forums and 7Sage/PS LG's.

I was planning on take SuperPrep Test A at the end of the month then B in July, C in August, and then start railing out PTs 39-72 in September (roughly one a day with extensive reviewing). What do you guys think? Is that too many PTs in one month? If anything, I'll push back to December if need be.

Advice?