Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions

Post by ltowns1 » Mon Feb 02, 2015 9:01 am

When looking for condtionality in suff. questions am I looking for the something in the conclusion to trigger the premises sufficient statement? (Or the contrapositive of the stimulus)
Last edited by ltowns1 on Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
LSAT Hacks (Graeme)

Bronze
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:18 pm

Re: Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions

Post by LSAT Hacks (Graeme) » Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:21 pm

Your question isn't quite clear. But here's what you're looking for in SA questions. Most will follow a format like this:

Conclusion: A --> D
Evidence: A --> B, B --> C

Step 1: Draw conclusion
Step 2: Separate elements of conclusion: A _______ D
Step 3: Fill in evidence A --> B --> C ___ D
Step 4: Spot gap. Look for the answer that bridges the gap. In this case, C --> D or D --> C

I cannot emphasize enough how routine sufficient assumption questions should be.

Note: I used ______ because TLS doesn't show more than one space. Is there a way to make comments have more than one space between letters? It's relevant for some diagrams.

User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Re: Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions

Post by ltowns1 » Mon Feb 02, 2015 12:50 pm

LSAT Hacks (Graeme) wrote:Your question isn't quite clear. But here's what you're looking for in SA questions. Most will follow a format like this:

Conclusion: A --> D
Evidence: A --> B, B --> C

Step 1: Draw conclusion
Step 2: Separate elements of conclusion: A _______ D
Step 3: Fill in evidence A --> B --> C ___ D
Step 4: Spot gap. Look for the answer that bridges the gap. In this case, C --> D or D --> C

I cannot emphasize enough how routine sufficient assumption questions should be.

Note: I used ______ because TLS doesn't show more than one space. Is there a way to make comments have more than one space between letters? It's relevant for some diagrams.
Not sure,I think I get what you're saying. Could you give a made up example of an actual argument???? It's weired but I always get confused with the ABC examples lol.
Last edited by ltowns1 on Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
LSAT Hacks (Graeme)

Bronze
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 9:18 pm

Re: Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions

Post by LSAT Hacks (Graeme) » Mon Feb 02, 2015 4:43 pm

All aarvarks are distraught.

Evidence: All ardvarks are bleak. Bleak things are confused about their role in life.

Right answer: If you're confused about your role in life, you're distraught.

User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Re: Conditional reasoning in sufficient questions

Post by ltowns1 » Mon Feb 02, 2015 6:16 pm

LSAT Hacks (Graeme) wrote:All aarvarks are distraught.

Evidence: All ardvarks are bleak. Bleak things are confused about their role in life.

Right answer: If you're confused about your role in life, you're distraught.

Got it

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”