REA LSAT Logic Games Book Forum

[lawjag2015]

Can anyone talk from experience about the usefulness, or lack thereof, of the REA LSAT Logic Games book?

[Clyde Frog]

Sounds bad. Link?

[BP Robert]

To be perfectly frank, I'm a little dubious simply because I haven't heard of their product (neither has Mr Clyde, it seems). In the competitive test prep market, the stronger products tend to float to the surface and get large-scale exposure pretty well, so the fact that we haven't heard of REA before may indicate that it's sub par (or sub-surface, to extend the analogy).

Best luck,

Blueprint LSAT Prep

[Dr. Nefario]

The rough general consensus is to study the LG Bible for logic games then supplement with material of your choice. As BPRob said, recognition is everything with LSAT material.

[LSAT Hacks (Graeme)]

Ignore it. I used to teach for a company that used that. Their speciality was the SAT, so they had it randomly.

I looked at it; it was no good. I had the company ditch it and just use the 10 actual books. Would not recommend REA to anyone.

Get one of the guides that's frequently recommended on here: LSAT Trainer, Powerscore, Manhattan

[LSAT Blog]

It's listed in this thread, which contains other LSAT prep books to avoid as well:

http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 6&t=210051

[Jeffort]

The REA LG book is filled with fake logic games ('simulated LSAT logic games' as they describe them in the book) written by the author/publisher, not real official LSAT LGs written by LSAC that have appeared on previously administered LSATs.

Friends don't let friends prep with fake/simulated LSAT questions/LGs because they're different in many ways than official LSAC produced LGs that you'll encounter when doing PTs with official LSATs and on test day.

[lawjag2015]

Just what I suspected. Thanks for the feedback!