LSAC f**ked up on PT1-S3-Q2 Forum

[I<3ScholarlySweets!]

The stimulus—and the credited response—has the following structure:

A --> ~B
~B --> A


The question is a parallel question. But notice that the reasoning above is invalid (i.e. flawed). The question should be a parallel flaw question; not a parallel question.

[BillsFan9907]

No. Back then they didn't tell you if it was flawed or not (or didn't always tell you).

[I<3ScholarlySweets!]

By saying 'no' to the OP, you are committed to the position that "LSAC did not fuck up. The question is not inaccurate."

[fats provolone]

oh shit you're committed now! it's going on your permanent record

[I<3ScholarlySweets!]

Is fats provolone a literal retard? Sounds like it.

[BillsFan9907]

By saying 'no' to the OP, you are committed to the position that "LSAC did not fuck up. The question is not inaccurate."

Yes I am commited to that position.

[I<3ScholarlySweets!]

You must be too stupid to realize that said position is consistent with accepting the invalid (i.e. flawed) reasoning in the OP as valid reasoning.

[stray]

lol, here we go again.

[fats provolone]

Please don't hate me for sounding sexist, pep, and I know I will get a lot of crap from the femposters here for this, but I think it may be different for me cause I'm a guy. Everyday I get older, I look better, physically. I also accumulate more money. I get more confident and experienced. But I can't fully enjoy life right now cause of certain limitations and because I know there is lots of progress to be made in my life. Men hit their peaks at a later age in their lives. All the women my age are dating older men. If I get married it would be to a 20 year old when I'm 40.

[Nebby]

Hey guys, can we be honest&good ITT? no drama

[Username123]

lolz

[hairbear7]

By saying 'no' to the OP, you are committed to the position that "LSAC did not fuck up. The question is not inaccurate."

Hahaha wtf

[ilikebaseball]

I bet you he really thought this thread was a great idea

[GreenTee]

tagging for lols

[Hand]

Please don't hate me for sounding sexist, pep, and I know I will get a lot of crap from the femposters here for this, but I think it may be different for me cause I'm a guy. Everyday I get older, I look better, physically. I also accumulate more money. I get more confident and experienced. But I can't fully enjoy life right now cause of certain limitations and because I know there is lots of progress to be made in my life. Men hit their peaks at a later age in their lives. All the women my age are dating older men. If I get married it would be to a 20 year old when I'm 40.

I think I just got a new favorite poster

[Smallville]

Please don't hate me for sounding sexist, pep, and I know I will get a lot of crap from the femposters here for this, but I think it may be different for me cause I'm a guy. Everyday I get older, I look better, physically. I also accumulate more money. I get more confident and experienced. But I can't fully enjoy life right now cause of certain limitations and because I know there is lots of progress to be made in my life. Men hit their peaks at a later age in their lives. All the women my age are dating older men. If I get married it would be to a 20 year old when I'm 40.

I think I just got a new favorite poster

you didnt know about him hand? go through his posts... you two would be great together

[Hand]

I think I just got a new favorite poster

you didnt know about him hand? go through his posts... you two would be great together

Jtard did you change your username? Between you and seoulless both with new usernames this is really a massively confusing thread

but no I didn't know this fine specimen yet but I'll be sure to pay attention from here on out

ETA: I petitioned slack for a username change the other day as well but he was not having it unfortunately

[Smallville]

I think I just got a new favorite poster

you didnt know about him hand? go through his posts... you two would be great together

Jtard did you change your username? Between you and seoulless both with new usernames this is really a massively confusing thread

but no I didn't know this fine specimen yet but I'll be sure to pay attention from here on out

ETA: I petitioned slack for a username change the other day as well but he was not having it unfortunately

Well I did it for like real reasons... I feel like changing urs would be just for the heck of it or something

[Hand]

I think I just got a new favorite poster

you didnt know about him hand? go through his posts... you two would be great together

Jtard did you change your username? Between you and seoulless both with new usernames this is really a massively confusing thread

but no I didn't know this fine specimen yet but I'll be sure to pay attention from here on out

ETA: I petitioned slack for a username change the other day as well but he was not having it unfortunately

Well I did it for like real reasons... I feel like changing urs would be just for the heck of it or something

I have real reasons as well! I mean unless you think that "it would be funny" is not a real reason to change my username to Seoulless

[NonTradLawHopeful]

The question is not inaccurate. LSAC presently deciding to give more information in a question stem is mutually exclusive to the amount of information they chose to give in past LSATs. The task is to find the parallel reasoning...congratulations on being smart enough to figure it out!

[Smallville]

I have real reasons as well! I mean unless you think that "it would be funny" is not a real reason to change my username to Seoulless

touche

[GreenTee]

The question is not inaccurate. LSAC presently deciding to give more information in a question stem is mutually exclusive to the amount of information they chose to give in past LSATs. The task is to find the parallel reasoning...congratulations on being smart enough to figure it out!

A parallel flaw question is a type of parallel reasoning question.

/thread

[fats provolone]

The question is not inaccurate. LSAC presently deciding to give more information in a question stem is mutually exclusive to the amount of information they chose to give in past LSATs. The task is to find the parallel reasoning...congratulations on being smart enough to figure it out!

A parallel flaw question is a type of parallel reasoning question.

/thread

you have now committed to disagreeing with the OP! tls is now an open capital entity!

[I<3ScholarlySweets!]

Invalid statements cannot be considered reasoning alone--that is an abuse of language. If a statement is invalid, you must use "flawed" to modify "reasononing" which is equivalent to: "A statement that is invalid."

[NonTradLawHopeful]

Invalid statements cannot be considered reasoning alone--that is an abuse of language. If a statement is invalid, you must use "flawed" to modify "reasononing" which is equivalent to: "A statement that is invalid."

No you don't. Just stop. You're embarrassing yourself. Parallel reasoning is parallel reasoning whether it is flawed or not.