embedded conditionals Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
glee66

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:01 pm

embedded conditionals

Post by glee66 » Sun Sep 28, 2014 10:58 am

Hi guys

I just have a quick question
So (a->b) ->c turns to a+/b->c. What about a->(b->c)?

BP Robert

Bronze
Posts: 196
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 2:50 am

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by BP Robert » Mon Sep 29, 2014 4:36 pm

Hmm I'm a little unclear on your notation.

Both of those look like they equate to A --> C, so tentatively I'd say yes both work

glee66

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by glee66 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:24 pm

Thank you for your reply. So my question is how you would diagram conditional within conditional. For instance, a unless b but only if c. Thank you.

User avatar
gatesome

Bronze
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 7:43 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by gatesome » Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:31 pm

glee66 wrote:Thank you for your reply. So my question is how you would diagram conditional within conditional. For instance, a unless b but only if c. Thank you.
trying my hand at this...

"a unless b but only if c" == "If C, then (A unless B)" == "If C, then (If not-B then A)"

a IF NOT b == (/B -> A)
ONLY IF c == C ->


Which I believe yields (/B -> A) -> C

Use parenthesis for clarity when using diagramming a conditional within a conditional.
Last edited by gatesome on Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.

glee66

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by glee66 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 10:59 pm

Doesnt only if signal necessary? (-a -> b) -> c?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
gatesome

Bronze
Posts: 412
Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 7:43 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by gatesome » Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:11 pm

glee66 wrote:Doesnt only if signal necessary? (-a -> b) -> c?
yeah you're right, it should be (/B -> A) -> C

or (/A -> B) -> C

glee66

New
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 10:01 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by glee66 » Mon Sep 29, 2014 11:50 pm

Is there a simplify from there? Like by changing to and / or form?

RobertGolddust

Bronze
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:09 pm

Re: embedded conditionals

Post by RobertGolddust » Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:49 pm

~b->A->C

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”