September 2014 LSAT Vs June 2014 Forum

[MattM]

How did anyone who has taken the actual June exam compare today's exam to the one in June?

I really wished I would have taken it today based off what I have heard so far ( slightly easier, no odd logic games)...instead of waiting for Dec

( if you took June 2014 as a PT , i'd still like to know how it compared to today's)

[justabitunusual]

.

[MattM]

How close was June LSAT to your PT scores leading up to it? I also scored in the 150's in June.....I had a drop of about 6 points from what I was expecting due to the difficulty of it......one of my friends on June scored even worse than on his diagnostic due to the level of difficulty even though he studied for four months

[Causidicus]

June 2014 ended up scoring 169 when my PT average was 173. This test I honestly feel like I could have 180'd it.

[justabitunusual]

.

[justabitunusual]

.

[woodselle]

I struggled in June. My PT average leading up to it was a 168, and I scored a 162. I felt much better about the test yesterday (granted I studied a lot more from the June until now, and my PT average was around 170-172 this time), hoping to get at least a 170.

[LawBron James]

This was much easier than June. Of course, I could have made some dumb mistake and messed my score up, but I thought it was more manageable across the board, except maybe LG (LG 4 wasn't my issue with June's test).

[cm_burns]

I've only taken June's LG. IMO June's LG was 3 pretty easy games and 1 puzzling one I didn't know how to approach, Sept's was 1 hard game, 2 average ones, and 1 easy one. I would've rather had June's LG on yesterday's test.

[kinseyjo]

Same for me. I scored a 157 in June after a PT average of 162-165. Studied my ass off this time around and have been consistently PT-ing around 170. That June test was just HARD. Really hoping for a good score this time around.

[hillz]

I took in June and thought Sept was slightly easier. I'm not sure if it was easier because I have studied more or if it was actually easier.

RC: About the same, maybe a little easier than June.
LG: Just different. I didn't know how to approach LG 4 in June at all and had to guess on every question but one. I thought most of the Sept games were time-consuming but I knew how to do all of them and there was no really tough game. They were all about medium.
LR: About average difficulty. I think I messed these up, but because I was nervous, not because there were more difficult than June. There were definitely a few questions that seemed to have stumped most people.

Overall, nothing really crazy or unexpected about Sept test.

[Oskosh]

I didn't sit for the June test, but the June test was just overall very difficult based on my PTing performance. The RC was difficult, and the two LR sections were very difficult. I think that the 4th game was also very difficult, but once you played around with it, you should have been able to figure it out. I don't think the first game was as abnormal as people made it out to be (I actually set it up as a grouping game and it worked just fine). So yeah, the June test was just a different beast.

[Carla36]

I took the June PT and took the Sept actual test, and found June way harder. My PTs ranged from 170-178 (mostly depending on the RC). When I PT with the June one, I got a 168 on it, I completely bombed RC and got a few wrong on the last LG because it was mad weird. The Sept test I found easier than any of the last ten most recent PTs; I finished every section with 4-5 mins left, every LG was completely doable, the RC was pretty simple, and the LR wasn't that bad at all. But hey, for all I know I could get a 150, this test sucks lol.

[DaRascal]

That June LSAT is something I wish I could forget. I choked big time! To quote Conrad: "The horror! The horror!"