Seeking help on LR 72-S2-21 Forum

[umichan]

Here's how I figured out E is wrong:

Stimulus: X consists not in A, but B
Conclusion: X' consists tends to be one not as C, but as D.

Gap: X--B --> D

B addresses exactly this gap, but E is kind of the opposite:

Negation of E would be: C-->B, together with the stimulus that X-->B, we can not yield anything with regard to X and C.
If we change E into "one's sense of approval of one's character and projects does not increase one's material well-being", can we say this is also a right Necessary Assumption? (meaning B--/C, X--B => X--/C)

And the lesson of this question is that always heeding the right "direction" of the conditional logic in the Answer Choices?

Any help? Thank you in advance!

[BillPackets]

is this how you normally approach NA questions

[umichan]

is this how you normally approach NA questions

Yes... any comments?

[BillPackets]

Idk pretty mechanical typically you don't need to approach them in such a way n just takes longer don't have that Q in front of me ATM but in that particular Q you just needed to link premise to conclusion which is what B did. I'm just sayin there's an easier way to do them bc typically NA either require u 2 link premise to conclusion or fill a gap

[umichan]

Idk pretty mechanical typically you don't need to approach them in such a way n just takes longer don't have that Q in front of me ATM but in that particular Q you just needed to link premise to conclusion which is what B did. I'm just sayin there's an easier way to do them bc typically NA either require u 2 link premise to conclusion or fill a gap

Thanks BillPackets! I think I might overthink on this one... But I think I remember a similar Q with a different kind of right answer choice. Will post here if I can dig it up. Thank you again!