Feb 99 Hardest LSAT Forum
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
I mean I think some of the tests w the -8 or -9 curve to get a 170 are just as hard to get a similar score to PT B which has a -15 curve. It's all relativeSeoulless wrote:Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Holy grey is an LSAT prodigy.
Yea but B is nbd
Yea but B is nbd
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Sup grey looks like we found another thread to chatter in
- BillPackets

- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Sup bill is in the party too
- BillPackets

- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
IMHO this test was pretty hard idc what colonel says oh it's all relative yeah sure but that necessary assumption q bout tillage was basically a riddle
- Colonel_funkadunk

- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
If I hear u say riddle one more time
- BillPackets

- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Really? What have u said?smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
- BillPackets

- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
It was her second PT n she 178ed it like it's nbdSeoulless wrote:Really? What have u said?smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
-
BillsFan9907

- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
- w0w

- Posts: 569
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
smccgrey wrote:BillPackets wrote:Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle
Sorry Seoulless... I hope we answered your question adequately before derailing this thread.
I think Superprep B has a -15 170, and I've seen a couple with -14 170. Don't think that makes it harder though.
I think last oct or dec was a -14.
- BillPackets

- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me offSeoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
-
03152016

- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)BillPackets wrote:Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me offSeoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT
Hope not. I'm a weirdo who finds circle games so fun for some odd reason. Much prefer them to pattern games of the other miscellaneous ones.Brut wrote:the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)BillPackets wrote:Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me offSeoulless wrote:Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so
the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line
Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything