Is it a bad idea to use TM for LR and RC and 7sage for LG? Forum

[psbrathwaite]

Is it a bad idea for me to finish using the rest of my TestMasters course for Logical Reasoning and Reading Comp, but learning Logic Games with 7sage's methodology and videos? I don't like TestMaster's way of teaching logic games and am dissatisfied with the videos they offer me, as well as the amount of time allocated to Logic Games in my particular course. We tend to get to it at the end of class, and then rush through it. I also don't like their videos, as it's not clear and to the point enough for me like 7sages.

I'm taking the September LSAT, and I currently am bombing LG on practice tests. I know only a little bit more than nothing.




In short: Would it be detrimental to use Testmasters for LG and RC and 7sage for LG ( this may mean ignoring or walking out of my testmasters ocurse whenever we get to LG content )

[BillPackets]

No, use the 7sage videos. Those things saved my ass.

I used the LSAT trainer, manhattan, powerscore and 7sage while studying. Using different books never messed me up. It was quite useful.

[surf]

I'm in my TM class (right now actually lol and doing LG) but yeah I think robin takes too much time to explain the games. Thorough yeah but 7sage gets the job done in about half the time.

[alexrodriguez]

I've been thinking about this a lot lately.

I would go ahead and stick with 7sage's methodologies and if you find anything useful in your TestMasters class go ahead and use those concepts as well, but I don't think reading through their LG explanations is worthwhile. 7Sage's videos are the way to go.

I'm also in a TestMasters class so I know what you're going through. I will say though that I have learned a few things from my instructor about games that 7sage hadnt provided me.

Both are really great tools. You just have to know when one is better and what ideas work better for you.

[schmelling]

.