Preptest A Sec-4 #8 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Preptest A Sec-4 #8

Post by ltowns1 » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:12 pm

What is the conclusion of this argument? I have seen this question before, but I never quite figured it out from a structural point of view. I think I had the wrong conclusions. I thought it was the part that started with "therefore" but now I think it is the part that starts with " however". It makes more sense to me in that order.

User avatar
sashafierce

Bronze
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 11:44 am

Re: Preptest A Sec-4 #8

Post by sashafierce » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:47 pm

Hi, I just did this preptest so maybe I can help. The conclusion is the part about "these retailers do not make more money on each sheet of plywood than before the disaster".

The part that comes after therefore "...plywood cost to retailers is higher..." is the subsidiary conclusion because it is supported by the premise "transporting the plywood is difficult and expensive" and it in turn supports the main conclusion.

What made me realize very early on that that part was the conclusion is the fact that the stimulus went like this " Background info.....Some people denounce/think......." Those types of arguments on the LSAT usually conclude "Those people were wrong for thinking XYZ....... because of ABC.....


HTH :)

User avatar
ltowns1

Silver
Posts: 717
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 1:13 am

Re: Preptest A Sec-4 #8

Post by ltowns1 » Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:58 pm

Yeah you're totally right.Thanks Sashafierce.


Btw:(I always wanted to call somebody Sashafierce lol)

Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”