Did Manhattan make an error or did I? Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
rbrown0824

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 7:32 pm

Did Manhattan make an error or did I?

Post by rbrown0824 » Thu Jul 31, 2014 5:34 am

I'm reading the MLSAT second edition of LR where they cover conditional logic. They give an example during a drill: Many dogs weigh more than 20 pounds, and many dogs are difficult to train. They then ask what, if anything can be inferred. I thought nothing, but they say that one could infer that some dogs that are difficult to train weigh more than 20 pounds. I was wondering how this is possible? If there are 100 million dogs in the world and 1 million are difficult to train, and 1 million are over 20 pounds, then there is no evidence that suggests these two categories must necessarily overlap. Am I wrong here? I though an arbitrary reference to "many" was the same thing as say "some" since we cannot infer whether it is most or all.

User avatar
Bigfish41

Bronze
Posts: 114
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: Did Manhattan make an error or did I?

Post by Bigfish41 » Thu Jul 31, 2014 6:03 am

You can't combine two some statements. Same with most and a some

Manhattan LSAT Noah

Silver
Posts: 744
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:43 am

Re: Did Manhattan make an error or did I?

Post by Manhattan LSAT Noah » Thu Jul 31, 2014 12:35 pm

Yup, you caught an error there. Fixed in 3rd (and now 4th) editions. Thanks for pointing it out.

BTW, 2nd edition errata page is here.

Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”