Manhattan LSAT Forum vs. TLS. Forum

[mollyp22@]

Manhattan has tried to model their page off of TLS but they're a failure! They only let the experts respond to questions from the LSAT and they take FOREVER to respond.

[Clyde Frog]

K

[mollyp22@]

I guess that's a sign of approval.

Edited for Poll!

[rebexness]

Yeah I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

[mollyp22@]

Yeah I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

Actually I'm not, they very rarely respond to posts and when they do it's totally condescending anyway. If someone else responds that is not an expert they either delete their message/ or refute it. They have to maintain an "expert" image so they have to do these things.

[AbhiJ]

Biased poll.

[rebexness]

Funny they have never deleted any of my posts.

[papercut]

What do you guys think? Top 10 dumbest threads? Top 5?

Do we really need to shit on a reputable prep company? How about some TLS >> prep companies circle jerk?

I've seen the MLSAT person put in a lot of work here helping ppl with their LSAT questions.

[rebexness]

I've seen the MLSAT person put in a lot of work here helping ppl with their LSAT questions.

This x8753245678998763468

[A. Nony Mouse]

Nothing to see, here, everyone, it's our latest troll-alt (who got pissed at LSAT companies when one didn't give him a prize in a contest they were running here? IDK). He's gone for now, until he comes back again.