LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT Forum

[dreamofNYC]

Anyone?

I am hoping LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC

[jcccc]

People are saying the 2nd one.
I hope so

[Hoping4Happiness]

well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol

[dreamofNYC]

well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol

Interesting, I didn't even think of that. Indeed, the first LR had 25 Q whereas LR2 the presumably experimental one had 26. I would expect one section of 25Q and the other of 26Q vs. both 26Q. Fingers crossed!

[AJB]

I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26

[dreamofNYC]

I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26

Hmm you may be right.

[dreamofNYC]

LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC!! has been confirmed for Dec 2013!!

[A. Nony Mouse]

People, there is extensive discussion of this in the waiters' thread, we don't need a bunch of individual posts rehashing it.
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... 6&t=220914