. Forum

iamgeorgebush · Post by **iamgeorgebush** » Sun Oct 27, 2013 9:31 am

I don't know that it'd be worth your time, based on what you've been saying. If the BP method works for you, stick with that. At this point, it's probably just a matter of practicing enough to get consistent -0s.

Howl · Post by **Howl** » Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:52 am

I guess you could read it for reference, and see if there are any new/fresh perspectives on the LG that might help you trim time or get inferences faster. If you're not getting up to speed on LG, then you have enough time to try mixing and matching several methods. But PS LG is definitely not the end-all, be-all of LG that a lot of people make it out to be. I for one found their sequencing annotations really cumbersome until I switched to another method.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:56 am

iamgeorgebush · Post by **iamgeorgebush** » Sun Oct 27, 2013 11:56 am

jaylawyer09 wrote:well for the most part, I finish games pretty quickly, like 5-8 minutes, with the exception of 10-12 for really hards ones. (snakes, lizards, used/new cd game etc.)

But I think I will read it, just so i dont miss out on anything, better safe than sorry

That's a great sign. If you're already finishing games this quickly, with a 90%+ accuracy rate, you're on the right path for June.

Agreed though, better safe than sorry, as long as you're not neglecting other areas of the test. It would be a mistake to focus on LG to the exclusion of LR and RC.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sun Oct 27, 2013 12:22 pm

. Forum

.

Re: Should I even read PS lg?

Re: Should I even read PS lg?

.

Re: Should I even read PS lg?

.

Register now to search topics and post comments!