. Forum

Dr.Zer0 · Post by **Dr.Zer0** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:04 am

I've read both books, and tbh I would recommend just sticking with BP LG. Their diagram methods are more intuitive than PS LG. But if you are adamant about doing both, I would do BP LG first and drill after every chapter using the Cambridge packets. Then I would skim over PS LG. The only thing the PS LG has over the BP book is that PS has a chapter dedicated to Misc./Neither games.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 12:24 am

haus · Post by **haus** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 2:34 am

I sampled both books, and opted to read BP for LG. In the samples I looked at, I seemed to grasp the material more readily from the BP book.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 11:16 am

Cambridge LSAT · Post by **Cambridge LSAT** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 6:05 pm

This chart will give you a good starting point. The classifications don't always line up neatly (especially for Assignment games), but it should help for drilling.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sat Sep 14, 2013 7:48 pm

Erickt26 · Post by **Erickt26** » Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:05 pm

jaylawyer09 wrote:
Cambridge LSAT wrote:This chart will give you a good starting point. The classifications don't always line up neatly (especially for Assignment games), but it should help for drilling.
Wow!
thanks

I will begin the drilling with the BP book tmrw

I think 7sages method to approaching games is more time efficient. I took blueprint and they have a great method for balanced unbalanced games.

. Forum

.

.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

.

Re: Anyone try drilling with BP LG?

Register for access!