PT 62 section 2 #16 (Seeking input) Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
jvaugh57

New
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:58 pm

PT 62 section 2 #16 (Seeking input)

Post by jvaugh57 » Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:05 am

Premise:
Snoring-->Serious abnormalities

Conclusion:
Snoring causes damage

I see the correlation to causation fallacy (now), but when I was doing this under timed conditions that seemed like a slight equivocation. After seeing the "E" was the answer: Abnormalities do not cause snoring(thereby strengthening by removing alternate cause), I realized that I should have looked more critically at this.

Is this the gist of the problem, did I just miss that "serious abnormalities" and "damage" are equivalent terms or is there more to it?


LSAT minds greater than mine please feel free to chime in...
Top
Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”