Yeah, I chose (A), but now I get how it doesn't really weaken the argument because the argument doesn't rely on the assumption that lie-detector tests measure
every physiological reaction that occurs when someone is lying.
But I'm still not clear on how (D) weakens the argument because (correct me if I'm wrong in my thought process here) the stimulus doesn't say that the lie-detector tests are a "sure way" of determining when someone is NOT lying - it only says that they are a sure way of detecting when someone IS lying. So if the detector can determine both a liar AND someone who didn't lie, isn't it still effectively determining when someone
is lying?
armedwithamind wrote:The argument here is:
Lying accompanied by physiological reactions -> Lie detector tests that detect these reactions are sure way to determine when someone is lying
(D) Weakens the answer by explaining that physiological reactions are also caused by the act of taking a lie detector test. The key here is the absolute "sure." Had the stimulus been less absolute in its conclusion, (D) would not be a credited answer choice.
Which answer choice did you choose as the credited choice? B, C, & E jump out at me as being completely irrelevant. Did you select A?