. Forum
- VegasLaw702

- Posts: 90
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:40 am
- mindarmed

- Posts: 957
- Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 2:16 pm
Re: Anyone feel like LG and LR strategies are counterproductive?
you hit the nail on the head. the key to RC is to read slowly, you have MORE than enough time to answer the questions once you really digest what you're reading. fast reading haunted me for the longest time, and i'd miss very small important details on RCVegasLaw702 wrote:So I've been consistently nailing LG and LR with either -0, -1. For what its worth, I'm being held back from the high 170s by RC (-6 and even sometimes -8). But when I go back and look at the answer, I would have got it right if I had SLOWED DOWN! I feel like my natural style of reading is counterproductive to the skills needed to master RC. My natural tendency is to read fast and skim, which is what I feel is crushing me when it comes to RC. Other than the obvious: slow the fuck down, is there a consensus on which book/system works the best? I ordered the Manhattan RC book, but the size of it leaves me wondering if there is really anything in it that will help me out. Thoughts?
- Pneumonia

- Posts: 2096
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 3:05 pm
Re: Anyone feel like LG and LR strategies are counterproductive?
The Manhattan book is worth the read; don't be fooled by the size.
-
Brixton

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 7:37 pm
Re: Anyone feel like LG and LR strategies are counterproductive?
Exactly! It's not the size of the LSAT book, but how you use it.Pneumonia wrote:The Manhattan book is worth the read; don't be fooled by the size.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login