Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+ Forum
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
i know hard work can get you far, but how far really? If someone is dumb, then they're dumb, why tell them that a 170+ is possible for everyone and their grandma?
Just my 2 cents
This is the REAL world, not legally blonde
As for me, I'm getting a 175+
Just my 2 cents
This is the REAL world, not legally blonde
As for me, I'm getting a 175+
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A

- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
Are you trolling yourself?itachiuchiha wrote:As for me, I'm getting a 175+
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
- Bildungsroman

- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
loooool. Cute. Enjoy law school.TripTrip wrote:But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A

- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
lol what are you doing?itachiuchiha wrote:Here I am with a near 4.0.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
it is a general rule that a sub 170 won't likely net great options. Bils is obviously one exceptionitachiuchiha wrote:The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
-
itachiuchiha

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
dual major in legal studies and poli sciA → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:lol what are you doing?itachiuchiha wrote:Here I am with a near 4.0.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
Yield Protectitachiuchiha wrote:The dude just said that " if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school."JamMasterJ wrote:terrible analogy. it has more to do with the type of school you'll get into than how you'll fareitachiuchiha wrote:That is like saying that if someone can't break 1300 on the SAT, they should not go to college. Here I am with a near 4.0. The LSAT is NOT a good indicator of how a person will do in school. Neither was the SAT or any standardized test.TripTrip wrote:It's not possible for everyone to get over a 170. But if it's not possible for someone to break 170, they shouldn't go to law school.
DAMN, my highest was a 169, I guess Cooley is out of the question
- dowu

- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: Why do people on here just assume that anyone can get 170+
My lowest score is a 176. If you can't get a 180 then you are DUMB.
- nygrrrl

- Posts: 4434
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 1:01 am
