RC-LR-LR-LR-LG Forum
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
LRs were 24, 26, an 25 Qs respectively. Which was experimental? Thanks!
-
Spartan_Alum_12

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I believe they were 26 - 26 - 25???teiswei wrote:LRs were 24, 26, an 25 Qs respectively. Which was experimental? Thanks!
-
elliottwarner

- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:15 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?
-
vulpixie

- Posts: 140
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:41 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Yeah, Smith and Folk Music was real.
-
Spartan_Alum_12

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Yes, that RC was real.elliottwarner wrote:25, 26 were real. I had 2 RC, was Mexican Folk Music and Pin Theory/ Adam smith real?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Yumizzz

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?
-
Spartan_Alum_12

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Wow, how many different LR experimental sections can there be?Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?
-
framboozer

- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?
-
Yumizzz

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:48 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I expected so, since the third one seemed to me pretty easy...framboozer wrote:I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Wow, I've never heard of two different experimental sections for the same type.Yumizzz wrote:I expected so, since the third one seemed to me pretty easy...framboozer wrote:I had that too. I think the first one was experimental but they all blended together for me honestly.Yumizzz wrote:I got 25-26-25... Not sure which one of the 25 sections is experimental... Anyone with any ideas about this?
-
MissJenna

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 11:18 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.
(((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.
- red52

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
the exp was the one with the 90's style questioning (IE: passage then Q's 3-4)
btw that section was hard as hell... im so glad it was exp. the RC was rather hard too..... i honest dont know how i did... its going to literally be up to my LR's to determine my score.
btw that section was hard as hell... im so glad it was exp. the RC was rather hard too..... i honest dont know how i did... its going to literally be up to my LR's to determine my score.
-
cynthiad

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:16 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
voicemail? idk if it was a type. I've never seen one like it.MissJenna wrote:Can someone please tell me what type of game the 3rd one was? I couldn't believe how lost I was.(((( Given how much it stressed me out....I can't even remember details of it!! Arghhhh!!! I was something 1 day, 2 days and 3 days.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
corcorty

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST
- LionelHutzJD

- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I had the same setup and definitely did not have an LR with a two question stimulus.
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
USER WAS BANNED FOR ANOTHER POST, BUT IS AN IDIOT AND WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR THIS ONE TOO
- LionelHutzJD

- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- red52

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.
lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?red52 wrote:LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.
lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...
- red52

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
no.... i was preoccupied with my exp section.... so hard... i hard exp LR and i literally felt like they put every single parallel/flawed similar reasoning question in the book in that section.... im so glad its not scored otherwise id be canceling right about now.teiswei wrote:I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?red52 wrote:LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.
lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...
-
corcorty

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
Had to have been at least 6 in that section. I hate parallel flaw questions so much.red52 wrote:no.... i was preoccupied with my exp section.... so hard... i hard exp LR and i literally felt like they put every single parallel/flawed similar reasoning question in the book in that section.... im so glad its not scored otherwise id be canceling right about now.teiswei wrote:I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?red52 wrote:LionelHutzJD wrote:I really feel like I did well on LR but then again I really don't know.
lol this^^ there were so many MP questions...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- red52

- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:28 am
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
corcorty wrote: I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?
i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.
-
Spartan_Alum_12

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:14 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I still don't know which LR was experimental for me. I didn't have any stimulus with two questions, I'm 90% sure at least.red52 wrote:corcorty wrote: I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?
i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.
Last edited by Spartan_Alum_12 on Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
That's the worst part. One bad section can kill your confidence and impact the rest of your test. The best thing to hope for is that it's your last section and it kills your writing sample. I am still annoyed that I had to do it. I feel like it is going to get removed as soon as I'm done with the LSAT.red52 wrote:corcorty wrote: I feel this way every time. Range from -1 to -6 and usually end up doing well on one and not as well on the other. Anybody notice the influx of role questions?
i had to guess on the last 3.. i was freaking out after this section and thought about cancelling... im thanking the stars it was experimental... still though it left a terrible taste in my mouth to the point where i feel like i did bad even though i may have done ok.
-
corcorty

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:11 pm
Re: RC-LR-LR-LR-LG
I hear ya, games is my reliable section too. I went with it as a grouping question but realized for me it made more sense to make it a 1-1.teiswei wrote:I played it as a grouping game with 2 sides. It was easy, I thought, but I'm pretty good at games. It took a couple deductions but doable in 7-8 minutes.corcorty wrote:Was it a 1-1 Sequencing, doubling the entities?
Like everyone else, got through the first two LGs in 10 minutes, starting doing diagram for 3rd, moved on to 4th, which took 15 minutes. Going back to the third to come to the realization it would have been much easier diagrammed as a 1-1. Hopefully I got through it fine.
Hearing the exp. was the LR with a prompt for two questions. My mind's still so jumbled I don't know if that's a good or bad thing though.
Overall, I feel ten times better than after October. Hope everyone else did well.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login