PT 65 Section 4 #25 Forum
- sdwarrior403

- Posts: 114
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm
PT 65 Section 4 #25
We know that Lutsina believes futuristic scientific novels envisage radically new social arrangments. This was part of the reasoning used to state that these novels have more promise. So Lutsina would definitely disagree with D. Lutsina believes that these novels are doing those things. Answer D is stating that these novels are not doing those things.
On the other hand, Priscilla would agree with D. This was the entire point of her argument. This is a bad thing with these novels and why the most effective way of social criticism is through something else.
Help with this one.
On the other hand, Priscilla would agree with D. This was the entire point of her argument. This is a bad thing with these novels and why the most effective way of social criticism is through something else.
Help with this one.
-
natashka85

- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
Well C is the right answer,cause they both talk about it,Lustina saysFuturistic is better than the conventional,sdwarrior403 wrote:We know that Lutsina believes futuristic scientific novels envisage radically new social arrangments. This was part of the reasoning used to state that these novels have more promise. So Lutsina would definitely disagree with D. Lutsina believes that these novels are doing those things. Answer D is stating that these novels are not doing those things.
On the other hand, Priscilla would agree with D. This was the entire point of her argument. This is a bad thing with these novels and why the most effective way of social criticism is through something else.
Help with this one.
Priscilla says no conventional is the best one that means its better than the futuristic.
D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.
- sdwarrior403

- Posts: 114
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.natashka85 wrote: D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.
-
natashka85

- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.sdwarrior403 wrote:It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.natashka85 wrote: D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.
- sdwarrior403

- Posts: 114
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 8:13 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
Do you agree or disagree that answer choice D implies that envisaging of new social arrangements is not occurring in the futuristic science novels?natashka85 wrote:Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.sdwarrior403 wrote:It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.natashka85 wrote: D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.
Do you agree or disagree that Lutsina believes that futuristic science novels envisage new social arrangements?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
natashka85

- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
Do you agree or disagree that answer choice D implies that envisaging of new social arrangements is not occurring in the futuristic science novels?sdwarrior403 wrote:natashka85 wrote:Yea ,but Lustina doesn`t say technologies rather than social arrangement,she doesnt care about technologies also she doesnt mention about shortcoming that`s sth that only P discusses.sdwarrior403 wrote:It is not necessary for Lutsina to mention technologies. Look at what the answer choice is saying. Envisaging X rather than Y. We know that Lutsina states that the envisaging of Y is occurring in these novels. So this answer choice is stating that envisaging of Y is not occurring. This is something that Lutsina would diagree with. The lack of mention of technologies is not an issue.natashka85 wrote: D is wrong cause only P mentions that,L mentions new social arrangements but not technologies ,not there,if u can see that.
Do you agree or disagree that Lutsina believes that futuristic science novels envisage new social arrangements?[/quot
D is an irrelevant answer choice ,I dont know how u look at it but C is obviously right.
-
natashka85

- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm
Re: PT 65 Section 4 #25
U are going too far with your interpretation in the Lsat ,u are not allowed to do that,C is clearly right and D is irrelevant to one of the guys.