2/6 on zones. Regular -0 to -2 on LG. Zones is a bad game. It is written in such an absurdly stupid ambiguous manner and I'm not sure what that's trying to actually test. It's not even a hard game if you rewrite it in sensible terms.
Zones was a shot in the dark for most test takers. They either guessed right and got on the good side of the curve or guessed wrong. Hurray to LSAC for making such a pointless and ambiguous question that makes or breaks the administration for consistent test takers.
/rant
Zones is a bad game Forum
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Zones is a bad game
I forgot we could go back and read it now, I am going to look to see if it was as bad as I remembered
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 1:33 pm
Re: Zones is a bad game
It is almost as bad. I spent a long time just trying to understand what each question was asking and what each rule actually meant. Add the fact that it's test day, along with the last 6 questions of the entire test and you have a recipe for disaster.Br3v wrote:I forgot we could go back and read it now, I am going to look to see if it was as bad as I remembered
- gianna
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 7:47 am
Re: Zones is a bad game
Does anyone mind sending me the zones page? I have an undisclosed test and I've been dying to see how hellish this game was.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login