
I've been preparing for the LSAT, mainly with the goal of taking the February 2013 LSAT. (I started somewhere during the middle of summer.) My first diagnostic PT, the June 2007, scored at a 162. I've worked through the PS LG Bible and the Manhattan RC book and am about halfway through the PS LR Bible. I've also done all the LG's and about half the RC passages from about the first 40 PT's.
My original plan was to finish the LR Bible and all the RC passages from about 1-40 between now and December, and meanwhile work on any of the LR types that I find to have particular trouble with. After that, I'd take the 20-30 most recent PT's until Test Day in February. (I was planning on winter break to give me lots of time.)
However, the other day I took one of those free proctored LSATs -- five section, Dec. 2008 (so PT 56, with experimental from another exam in the 2000's), just without the writing section at the end. I ended up scoring a 175 (-0 on LG, -1, -0, and -4 on the three LR's, and -2 on RC). The company rep, once she heard of my score, advised me to just take the December LSAT, saying that a higher score wouldn't mean too much of a difference anyway.
I'm looking to get into a top 5 school (my GPA won't be an issue), and plan on taking the LSAT only once. I'm now trying to decide whether I should quickly finish the LR Bible and do a bunch of PT's, then jump right into the December LSAT, or follow my original plan and finish more thorough preparation before taking the February administration. Any advice? Although I'd be very happy with a 175, I'm a bit concerned about whether that was just an anomaly for some reason.
Thanks a lot in advance!