Inquiries on prep 11, Section 4 # 17 Forum

[soyeonjeon]

I will begin here a thread that contains questions from Prep test 17.
First, this one is on section 1, second game. I do not understand if the author is refering to 3 officers and 3 supervisors whi are all employees, or whether I should interpret this as a three supervisors plus F, G, H. Can someone help me understand this problem to begin with? Thank you.

[ws81086n]

Frankly, you have posted too many topics. That's probably why people have not replied to every one of them. Currently, there are 39 topics on the first page of this board, 12 of which were made by you. I am pretty sure that is way too many, and a bit rude. No one is saying don't post a good amount, but you can't just flood the board with every single question you have and expect to get a reply to all of them. Unreasonable.

[CyanIdes Of March]

I've already tried to explain to him/her that as well (did the same thing about a month and a half ago).

[soyeonjeon]

Well, I'll try not to. Except when I really cannot know. Thanks.

[dkb17xzx]

http://www.manhattanlsat.com/blog/index ... lanations/

[soyeonjeon]

can't figure out how to delete this post.

[Cerebro]

I will begin here a thread that contains questions from Prep test 17.
First, this one is on section 1, second game. I do not understand if the author is refering to 3 officers and 3 supervisors whi are all employees, or whether I should interpret this as a three supervisors plus F, G, H. Can someone help me understand this problem to begin with? Thank you.

The way I interpreted this question is that there are 6 employees altogether who are available to be assigned to committees. Half of them are supervisors and half of them are officers. When the author says that 3 employees are to be assigned to each committee, it means that the 3 must be selected from this population of 6 employees, whether they are officers or supervisors.