What type of flaw would this be?
Is it mistaking a temporal relationship as being a conditional one? Thanks in advance!!
7 of Section2 of prep 16 Forum
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:28 am
Re: 1 of Section3 of prep 16
Prep 16; section3; 1
Is this how i make a thread? By posting a reply to my own post?
For this one, i debated between a and d. But why would a not be an answer?
Thanks in advance.
Is this how i make a thread? By posting a reply to my own post?
For this one, i debated between a and d. But why would a not be an answer?
Thanks in advance.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 12:28 am
Prep16; section3; 15
Prep16; section3; 15
I see the flawed logic for this one and also see that C is the correct answer but can someone explain to me why B is incorrect? I don't clearly see why b is incorrect.
Thnks in advance!
I see the flawed logic for this one and also see that C is the correct answer but can someone explain to me why B is incorrect? I don't clearly see why b is incorrect.
Thnks in advance!
- Cerebro
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 9:22 pm
Re: 7 of Section2 of prep 16
If you would simply diagram the conditional statements in the stimulus, you would see that the flaw here is an illegal negation of the sufficient and necessary conditions. Here's how I diagrammed it:soyeonjeon wrote:What type of flaw would this be?
Is it mistaking a temporal relationship as being a conditional one? Thanks in advance!!
-public access --> bay polluted
public access --> -bay polluted
The correct answer choice will be one that improperly negates the terms in a conditional statement. (C) does just that:
violent criminals in solitary --> prison violence increases
-violent criminals in solitary --> -prison violence increases
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login