But baby you light up my world like nobody elsemrizza wrote:Hey Hawk, the jerk store called...HawkeyeGirl wrote:That's really great man, but just remember how easy the earlier RCs are compared to the newer ones. Not trying to burst your bubble, but I guess I sort of am lol.mrizza wrote:Just did PT 30... 178
very mixed emotions right now.
Edit: I did try Worm's strategy of summarizing every paragraph with a few words for my RC and only went -2 for RC... so thanks dude, seems to be helping a lot.
December 2012 Re-takers Forum
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
the 178 announcement was a warning shot for bitsy... bitch is going downHawkeyeGirl wrote:But baby you light up my world like nobody elsemrizza wrote:Hey Hawk, the jerk store called...HawkeyeGirl wrote:That's really great man, but just remember how easy the earlier RCs are compared to the newer ones. Not trying to burst your bubble, but I guess I sort of am lol.mrizza wrote:Just did PT 30... 178
very mixed emotions right now.
Edit: I did try Worm's strategy of summarizing every paragraph with a few words for my RC and only went -2 for RC... so thanks dude, seems to be helping a lot.
- Sugar Lumps
- Posts: 769
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 7:50 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I work between 50 and 55 hours per week. HALP.warandpeace wrote:Can I ask you guys who here was working full time? And in general, who spent less than 3 hours of prep a day? Just gathering info lol
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
THISSugar Lumps wrote:I work between 50 and 55 hours per week. HALP.warandpeace wrote:Can I ask you guys who here was working full time? And in general, who spent less than 3 hours of prep a day? Just gathering info lol
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Update: Post-it method seems to be working for RC. Obviously I'm not timing, but I'm trying to work as efficiently as possible. The question is, how long do I drill this for and where do I go from here?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Retook PT59 this morning,
LG:-1
LR:-2
LR:-2
RC:-5
Scaled Score: 173 (dat curve )
I actually learned a lot today, I took this at a semi-noisy Barnes & Nobles and really felt the test getting away from me. Really hard to absorb the words, everything felt really sluggish. This kinda describes the symptoms of my anxiety on test-day and I feel if I can overcome this, I can block out my anxiety on the real thing. My focus was definitely improving as the test went along and hopefully after a couple more of these, I'll have it down and start reaching my PT potential.
Big breakthrough and a big thanks to Noodles for the tip. Can't wait to break this test down with you guys tomorrow night.
LG:-1
LR:-2
LR:-2
RC:-5
Scaled Score: 173 (dat curve )
I actually learned a lot today, I took this at a semi-noisy Barnes & Nobles and really felt the test getting away from me. Really hard to absorb the words, everything felt really sluggish. This kinda describes the symptoms of my anxiety on test-day and I feel if I can overcome this, I can block out my anxiety on the real thing. My focus was definitely improving as the test went along and hopefully after a couple more of these, I'll have it down and start reaching my PT potential.
Big breakthrough and a big thanks to Noodles for the tip. Can't wait to break this test down with you guys tomorrow night.
Last edited by chadbrochill on Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GabeQuixote
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:26 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
What tip?chadbrochill wrote:Took PT59 this morning,
LG:-1
LR:-2
LR:-2
RC:-5
Scaled Score: 173 (dat curve )
I actually learned a lot today, I took this at a semi-noisy Barnes & Nobles and really felt the test getting away from me. Really hard to absorb the words, everything felt really sluggish. This kinda describes the symptoms of my anxiety on test-day and I feel if I can overcome this, I can block out my anxiety on the real thing. My focus was definitely improving as the test went along and hopefully after a couple more of these, I'll have it down and start reaching my PT potential.
Big breakthrough and a big thanks to Noodles for the tip. Can't wait to break this test down with you guys tomorrow night.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
That's awesome dude, congratschadbrochill wrote:Retook PT59 this morning,
LG:-1
LR:-2
LR:-2
RC:-5
Scaled Score: 173 (dat curve )
I actually learned a lot today, I took this at a semi-noisy Barnes & Nobles and really felt the test getting away from me. Really hard to absorb the words, everything felt really sluggish. This kinda describes the symptoms of my anxiety on test-day and I feel if I can overcome this, I can block out my anxiety on the real thing. My focus was definitely improving as the test went along and hopefully after a couple more of these, I'll have it down and start reaching my PT potential.
Big breakthrough and a big thanks to Noodles for the tip. Can't wait to break this test down with you guys tomorrow night.
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
To test in many environments...noisy, tired, hungover, whatever. The point is to make the test a routine and not a "big event". I used to always wait for perfect conditions to maximize my score, but in the end this is only cheating myself. I wanna go into the real test knowing I don't need the stars to align because I've dealt with way worse conditions.GabeQuixote wrote:What tip?chadbrochill wrote:Took PT59 this morning,
LG:-1
LR:-2
LR:-2
RC:-5
Scaled Score: 173 (dat curve )
I actually learned a lot today, I took this at a semi-noisy Barnes & Nobles and really felt the test getting away from me. Really hard to absorb the words, everything felt really sluggish. This kinda describes the symptoms of my anxiety on test-day and I feel if I can overcome this, I can block out my anxiety on the real thing. My focus was definitely improving as the test went along and hopefully after a couple more of these, I'll have it down and start reaching my PT potential.
Big breakthrough and a big thanks to Noodles for the tip. Can't wait to break this test down with you guys tomorrow night.
- enidwexler
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 10:05 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Never really cared much for the "test in different environments" tip, but the way you just put it makes SO much sense - especially for me (dealing with confidence issues). Thanks for that.chadbrochill wrote:The point is to make the test a routine and not a "big event". I used to always wait for perfect conditions to maximize my score, but in the end this is only cheating myself. I wanna go into the real test knowing I don't need the stars to align because I've dealt with way worse conditions.
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Wormfather wrote:What time are we doing the review?
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Just printed Cambridge LSAT RC and LR questions and the 10 tests I plan to re-take. Ordered Manhattan RC. I am now ready to do this!
Good Luck all!
Good Luck all!
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
No prob, glad you found it useful!enidwexler wrote:Never really cared much for the "test in different environments" tip, but the way you just put it makes SO much sense - especially for me (dealing with confidence issues). Thanks for that.chadbrochill wrote:The point is to make the test a routine and not a "big event". I used to always wait for perfect conditions to maximize my score, but in the end this is only cheating myself. I wanna go into the real test knowing I don't need the stars to align because I've dealt with way worse conditions.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- annet
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:19 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I want to say as part of the Velocity course you're supposed to do 3 or 4 full sections like that. I think I may have done 3 spread out over some other drilling.jackbauer10 wrote:Update: Post-it method seems to be working for RC. Obviously I'm not timing, but I'm trying to work as efficiently as possible. The question is, how long do I drill this for and where do I go from here?
Edit, missed the second part of the question. I went straight from there into full, time sections (or passages of I was really short on time).
- Psib337
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:18 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Did 16 RC passages today, no timer or anything I wanted to see how I did when I just slowed down and took my time, turned out pretty well I went -2 on 2, - 1 on 5, and was perfect for the other 9. My Manhattan books haven't come yet so hopefully I'll get a chance to drill LR and LG tomorrow, not taking a PT until Thursday I kinda wanted to go over everything again slowly before I jumped back into testing.
- gguuueessttt
- Posts: 473
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 5:18 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
-0 on 9 passages is really great.Psib337 wrote:Did 16 RC passages today, no timer or anything I wanted to see how I did when I just slowed down and took my time, turned out pretty well I went -2 on 2, - 1 on 5, and was perfect for the other 9. My Manhattan books haven't come yet so hopefully I'll get a chance to drill LR and LG tomorrow, not taking a PT until Thursday I kinda wanted to go over everything again slowly before I jumped back into testing.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
agreed! i did this (with post-its) and went -1 on 8 passages! good work guysgguuueessttt wrote:-0 on 9 passages is really great.Psib337 wrote:Did 16 RC passages today, no timer or anything I wanted to see how I did when I just slowed down and took my time, turned out pretty well I went -2 on 2, - 1 on 5, and was perfect for the other 9. My Manhattan books haven't come yet so hopefully I'll get a chance to drill LR and LG tomorrow, not taking a PT until Thursday I kinda wanted to go over everything again slowly before I jumped back into testing.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Just did PT 51....176...pissed off..
LR1: -0
RC: -2
LR2: -3
LG:-1
Why couldn't I have done this on test day?? So Riz doesn't yell at me, this is one of the "easier" RC tests, so that may have something to do with it.
LR1: -0
RC: -2
LR2: -3
LG:-1
Why couldn't I have done this on test day?? So Riz doesn't yell at me, this is one of the "easier" RC tests, so that may have something to do with it.
- CardozoLaw09
- Posts: 2232
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:58 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Well damn lol..all you did was slow it down? How much over the 35 minute mark did you go? (assuming you checked after)Psib337 wrote:Did 16 RC passages today, no timer or anything I wanted to see how I did when I just slowed down and took my time, turned out pretty well I went -2 on 2, - 1 on 5, and was perfect for the other 9. My Manhattan books haven't come yet so hopefully I'll get a chance to drill LR and LG tomorrow, not taking a PT until Thursday I kinda wanted to go over everything again slowly before I jumped back into testing.
Last edited by CardozoLaw09 on Sat Nov 03, 2012 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
But Worm, I think there's a noticeable difference in difficulty on PTs 60+(esp in RC), so is it really worth it to save a random one in the 40s for the week before? I took 51 today and I know I'd taken it before but have no idea when, and while the topics were vaguely familiar, I definitely felt like it was fresh.Wormfather wrote:Remember guys save a fresh PT for the last week. You'll need it so that you have something fresh and so that you can confirm your progress.
- Lenahan3
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 12:57 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I didn't note a definitive difficulty change from the 50's to the 60's. My scores remained fairly constant.HawkeyeGirl wrote:But Worm, I think there's a noticeable difference in difficulty on PTs 60+(esp in RC), so is it really worth it to save a random one in the 40s for the week before? I took 51 today and I know I'd taken it before but have no idea when, and while the topics were vaguely familiar, I definitely felt like it was fresh.Wormfather wrote:Remember guys save a fresh PT for the last week. You'll need it so that you have something fresh and so that you can confirm your progress.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
I thought RC got considerably harder in the upper 50s+...But I'm bad at RC as a whole, so I'm not sure.Lenahan3 wrote:I didn't note a definitive difficulty change from the 50's to the 60's. My scores remained fairly constant.HawkeyeGirl wrote:But Worm, I think there's a noticeable difference in difficulty on PTs 60+(esp in RC), so is it really worth it to save a random one in the 40s for the week before? I took 51 today and I know I'd taken it before but have no idea when, and while the topics were vaguely familiar, I definitely felt like it was fresh.Wormfather wrote:Remember guys save a fresh PT for the last week. You'll need it so that you have something fresh and so that you can confirm your progress.
Edit: I should say the questions got harder. I don't think the passages are any harder to read, but I think the questions and ACs are a lot more ambiguous and nuanced in later tests.
- HawkeyeGirl
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 9:13 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Hahahaha Worm!! You've finally come around to our nerdy Star Wars humor, even though you thought episode 2 was good!Wormfather wrote:Also, I felt a great disturbance in the force...and then I saw that our thread was locked.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:12 pm
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
Tonight I realized that my confidence in LG is totally shaken. I was a victim of Zones and now it seems like it's an ex-girlfriend haunting my nightmares and refusing to give me back my favorite sweatshirt. Games used to be my strongest section by far, (and dare I say most enjoyable?) and now I'm struggling with the ones I used to blow through. Should I chalk this up to being rusty? HALP!
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: December 2012 Re-takers
absolutely chalk it up to rust. do a bunch of practices, get your -0s, and regain your confidence. my "cold" PT after i decided to retake was a 170, and i was definitely nervous about how i was going to perform. did some drilling on some sections earlier today, then did another fresh PT and got a 178 today. confidence plays a huge factor, but its easily obtained. just do your drills and you'll get it back.jackbauer10 wrote:Tonight I realized that my confidence in LG is totally shaken. I was a victim of Zones and now it seems like it's an ex-girlfriend haunting my nightmares and refusing to give me back my favorite sweatshirt. Games used to be my strongest section by far, (and dare I say most enjoyable?) and now I'm struggling with the ones I used to blow through. Should I chalk this up to being rusty? HALP!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login