LR-RC-LR-LR-LG Forum

[skri65]

Any idea which LR was experimental?
Delete if inappropriate.

[specialsnowflake]

This is relevant to my interests

[nygrrrl]

Thanks, skri, for bringing up the topic of appropriateness. I'll leave this here as a reference.
(And no, you're good - you can debate which one was experimental just don't go into detail about the questions/answers.) Congrats on finishing the LSAT!

This is a warning. This is likely your only warning; you are unlikely to receive any further warnings.

Please be advised that discussion or solicitation (including, but not limited to, PMs and online chatrooms) of any questions or answers from the June 2012 LSAT with anything more than an extremely broad level of specificity will result in a temporary or permanent ban. This may include a permanent ban on your IPs if necessary, which will block you from even viewing the TLS forums. Permanent IP address bans for LSAT discussion have been issued in the past.

Examples have been included for your reference below. This is not an exhaustive list. It is not a defense to say that your overly-specific discussion of an LSAT question did not exactly mirror one of the examples - you will still be banned. Linking to other online materials/discussion of the LSAT questions is also prohibited.

Please note that you agreed not to discuss specific LSAT questions and answers when you completed your signing statement when taking the test. The LSAC considers it a violation to discuss specific questions and answers; the LSAC will act accordingly upon discovering discussion of specific questions and answers. Be advised that the LSAC and its agents monitor this board.

1. Games were hard. Okay.
2. Yeah, on the second question for the second game, I wasn't sure if C was just on Tuesdays or Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Ban.
3. No, the order is ACDBBE. Ban.
4. What about Question Four? If C can't go on Tuesdays, then it has to be Wednesday right? Ban.
5. You guys are stupid. The answer to Question Four and Five is D. Ban.
6. No, the answers are CDAABE. Ban.
7. C'mon guys. How can you not know all of the answers? Ban.

1. I thought the LR sections weren't too difficult. Okay.
2. What answers did you all get for the coffee growers question? Ban.
3. I got A. Ban.
4. That's weird, I thought it was either B or D. Ban.
5. But it was a parallel reasoning problem. Ban.
6. Damn it, I knew I should have picked B. Ban.
7. Hold on guys, I think the mods might get upset if we keep this up. Never a good sign.
8. Let's trick them by disguising what we're saying. So, hypothetically, if I were a coffee grower..... Ban.
9. You would be displeased with government regulation of pesticides. Ban.
10. But not price controls. Ban.
11. Is that because, hypothetically, price controls would raise prices and revenue? Ban.
12. It's just a cost problem in general. If you were a coffee grower, the legal pesticides would, hypothetically, cost more. Ban.
13. Whoa, it's just like Question 13 from the second LR section in PT 39. Ban.
14. Guys, maybe we should create a chatroom to discuss this. I started one: tinychat.com/letscheatontheLSAT Ban.
15. If you guys could PM me about this, that'd be great. Ban.

Please note that this warning applies to the Reading Comprehension section as well as the writing sample.

If you are in doubt as to whether your drafted post will run afoul of this warning, do not submit the post. You have been warned.

[VUSisterRayVU]

LG-RC-LR-LR-LG here

[lhanvt13]

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

Is this an okay amount of info ? If it's too much please let me know and I'll delete this post !

[skri65]

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

any basis for this?

[square_peg]

My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.

[lhanvt13]

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

any basis for this?

Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these

[britcham]

.

[lhanvt13]

My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.

Oh good god 2RCs are scary

[square_peg]

My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.

Oh good god 2RCs are scary

Yeah, I wasted the first three minutes of the second one freaking out about how I had two RC sections. I hope that one was experimental. XD

[lhanvt13]

My exam was RC-LR-RC-LG-LR.

Ugh...at least the two reading sections weren't back-to-back. That would've killed me.

Ihanvt13 - I had both of those.

Oh good god 2RCs are scary

Yeah, I wasted the first three minutes of the second one freaking out about how I had two RC sections. I hope that one was experimental. XD

Oh god the click (!) was so frustraiting to read .. Slowed me down so much haha kept thinking of russel peters

[princessofpower]

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG too. I thought the 2nd LR was the experimental one

[skri65]

I had LR-RC-LR-LR-LG too. I thought the 2nd LR was the experimental one

Be wrong. Please.

[Swimp]

I had the same order as the OP too. I actually thought the third one was probably experimental. Something about it just felt a little weird. But I thought I did about the same on all of them, so I don't really care which counted.

[VasaVasori]

.

[Eberry]

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

any basis for this?

Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these

I hope to sweet baby Jesus that you are right.


Someone verify this. Now.

[jjrialva]

What RC did you get?

[Grazzhoppa]

3rd LR was so strange. How could it not be experimental?

[Nolita Fairytale]

LR RC LR LR LG here I think sofa (2nd LR) and science fiction (3rd) were real

any basis for this?

Friend had 2 LR of which each contained these

I hope to sweet baby Jesus that you are right.


Someone verify this. Now.

Verified.

[05062014]

If the 26 q lr 1 was experimental and the two 25q ones after it counted I may be able to keep the tears from flowing quite so rapidly jk but lr 1 - exp yes ?

[Nolita Fairytale]

If the 26 q lr 1 was experimental and the two 25q ones after it counted I may be able to keep the tears from flowing quite so rapidly jk but lr 1 - exp yes ?

If it had 26 q's, yes.

[allthatyouvegot]

The only thing I remember about the LR I thought was experimental was there was a question towards the end about suspects. Does anyone else remember/not remember this? I remember sofas and science fiction but I can't for the life of me remember what section each of those were.

[05062014]

Did anyone blank on the first game ? I legit blanked and I knew the 2nd game was way harder but I killed it and stayed on course until I only had 4 min left for game one. There were a few gimmes but my diagram was useless and I was processing all of the rules in my head. I realizedhhow simple of a diagram it needed to be in order for me to finish in the clutch as the proctor said pencils down

[HuskyHopeful]

The first question on the first game. I was losing my fucking mind and then it clicked and i killed it