Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs? Forum
-
WanderingPondering

- Posts: 444
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:47 am
Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
If so, what is the difference? I've been hitting more snags early in the LR section than I did before. Can't really figure out what is the difference. More assumption questions in more recent tests?
-
kaseyb002

- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:55 pm
Re: Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
I think they are in a certain way. With the later ones, I have to read much more carefully and slowly (make sure you soak up everything). While the earlier ones the reading is a little more like RC (just get the overall reasoning and pick up whatever details you can).
That being said, I prefer the newer ones to the old ones. Sometimes the old ones would just throw some real curve balls. But that's just me.
That being said, I prefer the newer ones to the old ones. Sometimes the old ones would just throw some real curve balls. But that's just me.
-
suzige

- Posts: 307
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 11:10 pm
Re: Are LR sections in the later PTs harder than earlier PTs?
For me, the later PTs, especially the 60s, seem to have a more vague way of wording the actual question. I think that is what slows me down a bit.