Official signs of improvement thread Forum

[cloudhidden]

I'm not consistent -0/-1, but I will be by October 6...

Here's hoping, at least. Now I'm -0/-4, which is a bit wide for my liking. Last two tests have been -0 and -1 though, so hopefully that maintains.

50 percent of the time I'm -2 or -3, 25 percent of the time -0 or -1, and the other 25 percent anywhere from -5 to -7. I never really had enough leverage to get a handle on this section for good, but this just has to end. I can't afford a 25 percent chance of not scoring 172, let alone 175, just because of RC. Plus I take it personal in a way that I don't for LG or LR because of my reading background.

[Mr. Frodo]

Did anyone else notice how time consuming the games are on SP.B? Went -3 because I was rushing by the time I got to the furniture game.

[NoodleyOne]

Superprep games are pretty notorious on the difficulty scale. Haven't taken them in ages but I remember I had some issues.

[Mr. Frodo]

Superprep games are pretty notorious on the difficulty scale. Haven't taken them in ages but I remember I had some issues.

Makes sense, I was like, damn these are way more time consuming/unusual than usual games. I have yet to take a PTs in the 50s and above. Will be I happy with the alleged decrease in difficulty of those games? I'm still used to games in PTs from 1-38, since that's what I used to drill.