PT 17, Section 2, #21 Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

PT 17, Section 2, #21

Post by BillsFan9907 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:02 pm

I'm having some trouble rejecting E. If E weren't true, then it's possible that there are some fault lines that do not have earthquakes period. If that's the case, it looks like the author's argument is ruined as there are locations (near fault lines and in general) that are less likely to be hit by an earthquake. Please walk me through this.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”