Old tests vs New tests and LR Forum
-
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 6:20 pm
Old tests vs New tests and LR
Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
I like newer tests because it is more true to what you will see on gameday.bchirco wrote:Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
General consensus though is old LR is older (well, different really) older LG is easier, older RC is easier
- LionelHutzJD
- Posts: 629
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:37 am
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
Br3v wrote:I like newer tests because it is more true to what you will see on gameday.bchirco wrote:Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
General consensus though is old LR is older (well, different really) older LG is easier, older RC is easier
I thought older LG was harder...?
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:55 pm
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
I've always heard old LG is harder as well. In my very limited, recent PT experience (PT's 54 and June 07) , I've found LG's to be significantly easier. Can't dispute you about LR though...Br3v wrote:I like newer tests because it is more true to what you will see on gameday.bchirco wrote:Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
General consensus though is old LR is older (well, different really) older LG is easier, older RC is easier
Last edited by kaseyb002 on Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- North
- Posts: 4230
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:09 pm
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
Me too. Never heard anyone say this. Care to explain why?LionelHutzJD wrote:Br3v wrote:I like newer tests because it is more true to what you will see on gameday.bchirco wrote:Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
General consensus though is old LR is older (well, different really) older LG is easier, older RC is easier
I thought older LG was harder...?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 7:22 pm
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
RC arguably be the hardest section on the test.
- Br3v
- Posts: 4290
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:18 pm
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
Well current LG is more of a straight to the wall plug and chug, so i guess its just different
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:29 am
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
They are.LionelHutzJD wrote:Br3v wrote:I like newer tests because it is more true to what you will see on gameday.bchirco wrote:Hey All,
I'm planning on taking the October test and I'm finding a lot of weakness in RC and LR but destroying games (0-2 missed on average). I am going to focus on LR for the next 3-4 weeks but I wasn't sure if I should steer away from older tests.
Any suggestions? Also, would you suggest doing 35 min sections is the best way to build stamina for LR? I find that I am barely able to finish the section.
General consensus though is old LR is older (well, different really) older LG is easier, older RC is easier
I thought older LG was harder...?
-
- Posts: 571
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:36 pm
- glucose101
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 12:23 am
Re: Old tests vs New tests and LR
What do you mean by the RC questions being more "more straightforward"? Thanks!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login