LSAT Logic 101 Forum

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:24 am

I suppose you don't want nitpicking right?

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:32 am

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Mon Jun 25, 2012 1:44 am

Max324 wrote:
Clearlynotstefan wrote:I suppose you don't want nitpicking right?
Fire away. Wrote part of this drunk, I'm editing out mistakes as I go along.

I'll PM you so I don't muddy up this thread and ruin your sticky chances lol

adamerica1291 · Post by **adamerica1291** » Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:22 pm

Thanks for writing this. It's highly accessible and helpful. Within the guide you referred to the material as being used in the analytical reasoning section. How similar/different are the logical reasoning sections? Would you write another guide that covers them? Thanks.

I<3ScholarlySweets! · Post by **I<3ScholarlySweets!** » Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:26 pm

O! SUCH INSIGHT!

flawyers · Post by **flawyers** » Sun Dec 28, 2014 3:28 pm

^ ban this fool already.

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Sun Dec 28, 2014 5:49 pm

adamerica1291 wrote:Thanks for writing this. It's highly accessible and helpful. Within the guide you referred to the material as being used in the analytical reasoning section. How similar/different are the logical reasoning sections? Would you write another guide that covers them? Thanks.

you bumped a pretty old thread
appreciate the positive feedback
i don't make posts like this anymore though, for LR help you should ask around on the main board
fwiw, i used the powerscore LRB, and it worked well for me

I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:O! SUCH INSIGHT!

what a meaningful criticism
with posts like these, i can tell you're very smart

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:29 am

Wait do you remember what my antique critique was? I vaguely remember wanting to contribute to this.

PeanutsNJam · Post by **PeanutsNJam** » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:57 am

I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:O! SUCH INSIGHT!

Don't you try to do literally the exact same thing with your daily scholarly tips. except Brut is a 179 IIRC what's your score. Although IMO this is all info you can get in a powerscore bible or some other prep book.

03152016 · Post by **03152016** » Mon Dec 29, 2014 3:27 am

Clearly wrote:Wait do you remember what my antique critique was? I vaguely remember wanting to contribute to this.

i said conditionals have two statements, you argued that compound conditionals (and/or) have more than two
in retrospect, i shouldn't have said "statements" at all, framing it that way is confusing to students
i should have said "conditions", which, aside from being more precise, would have cleared up that ambiguity

man, it's only been two and a half years but it seems like ancient history

MattM · Post by **MattM** » Mon Dec 29, 2014 2:43 pm

How long did it take for you to get out of low 170's to high 170's and that awesome 179?

I'm in 168-171 range but trying to get into at least a 173 on test day

Clearly · Post by **Clearly** » Mon Dec 29, 2014 6:45 pm

MattM wrote:How long did it take for you to get out of low 170's to high 170's and that awesome 179?

I'm in 168-171 range but trying to get into at least a 173 on test day

Strictly timed?

LSAT Logic 101 Forum

LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Register for access!

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Re: LSAT Logic 101

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.