PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive? Forum
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive?
Is it just me, or do the logical reasoning questions from PT 1-7 seem to mirror the difficulty of the post June 2007 logical reasoning questions?
- dowu
- Posts: 8298
- Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:47 pm
Re: PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive?
Its just you. The general consensus is that the LR section during the earlier PTs is more convoluted - LSAC seems to have tightened up the arguments in the newer tests.Seoulless wrote:Is it just me, or do the logical reasoning questions from PT 1-7 seem to mirror the difficulty of the post June 2007 logical reasoning questions?
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive?
Thankfully. Many fewer "wtf" moments.nmop_apisdn wrote:Its just you. The general consensus is that the LR section during the earlier PTs is more convoluted - LSAC seems to have tightened up the arguments in the newer tests.Seoulless wrote:Is it just me, or do the logical reasoning questions from PT 1-7 seem to mirror the difficulty of the post June 2007 logical reasoning questions?
-
- Posts: 1381
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am
Re: PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive?
Wow, really? I thought the general consensus was that the games got easier and the logical reasoning got slightly harder. At any rate, you're saying that if you can do really good on the early LR's then you should be in more than good shape for the new ones?nmop_apisdn wrote:Its just you. The general consensus is that the LR section during the earlier PTs is more convoluted - LSAC seems to have tightened up the arguments in the newer tests.Seoulless wrote:Is it just me, or do the logical reasoning questions from PT 1-7 seem to mirror the difficulty of the post June 2007 logical reasoning questions?
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: PT 1-7 logical reasoning representitive?
No one can predict this. People have different strengths and weaknesses. Games are currently average in difficulty. Reading Comp is much harder. LR is written clearer, but is not necessarily easier for everyone. LR is now more likely to hinge on just a word or two (answer choices look very similar). In the distant past, it was more about wading through the BS to find the common sense answer.Seoulless wrote:Wow, really? I thought the general consensus was that the games got easier and the logical reasoning got slightly harder. At any rate, you're saying that if you can do really good on the early LR's then you should be in more than good shape for the new ones?nmop_apisdn wrote:Its just you. The general consensus is that the LR section during the earlier PTs is more convoluted - LSAC seems to have tightened up the arguments in the newer tests.Seoulless wrote:Is it just me, or do the logical reasoning questions from PT 1-7 seem to mirror the difficulty of the post June 2007 logical reasoning questions?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login