I have 3.9 GPA and I'm going to apply to T14, UCLA, Vandy, Fordham, U Texas, and USC this upcoming cycle. June '12 LSAT is my second take(got a 169 this Feb with a month of studying and slacking), and I really have to get 172-176 to have a decent shot at T6...
However, I totally bombed RC

!!! I did well on LG and LR (probably missed around 0-4 in total on those three sections), so I am even more agonising over whether to cancel it or not. I usually get 0-2 misses on RC, but this time a proctor gave a 5 min. announcement when I was just about to start on the last passage. So, I just skimmed through the last passage and took a chance of pure guess on the last 4-5 questions! This was my first time to run out of time and play pure guess on more than one question. If these 4-5 Q's are the only ones that I'm worried about, I wouldn't feel this bad. The questions allocated to the first three passages were bit ambiguous and time-consuming to me. so I am not 100% sure whether I got all or most of them right (I probably missed a few, if not several). The fact that these first three passages were absolutely doable makes me feel even worse.
I've been searching for posts on similar topics according to which it seems like 1) most law schools do not average your scores but just take your highest one (except HYS?) and 2) H hates retakes (well, June '12 was my second take. Would there be any difference between taking it twice or thrice?). Then people seem to have varying opinions regarding which would look worse to admission committee: low score-cancel-high score or low score-low/mid score-high score. Any opinion will be highly appreciated
