Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
User avatar
sd5289

Gold
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm

Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Post by sd5289 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:36 pm

You get to pay moar monies:

http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... e_going_up

Why? Straight from the horse's mouth:
"It is now time for us to correct our fees in light of new volume realities, and to align them more closely with the true value of those services to law schools and their applicants," Bernstine wrote. "We sincerely hope that this will be the only correction to our candidate-fee levels, and that the 'new normal' will identify itself in the next couple of years."
:roll:

User avatar
LSAT Blog

Silver
Posts: 1257
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Post by LSAT Blog » Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:47 pm

I wrote that story on Tuesday:

http://lsatblog.blogspot.com/2012/04/ls ... e-why.html

Funny how hers uses the same source as mine (an LSAC report from December) and came out the day after...

Anyway, we've been discussing the fee increase here:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p5425660

User avatar
sd5289

Gold
Posts: 1611
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Article: Bad news for 2012-2013 LSAT takers

Post by sd5289 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 2:03 pm

LSAT Blog wrote:Funny how hers uses the same source as mine (an LSAC report from December) and came out the day after...
Ooh, burn.

Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”