So I'm not sure if this is a fluke or not, but I took an older LR section today, pre 2000... And bombed it! -5-6, I score in the -1 range pretty consistently, so I thought I just had an off day, then I realized that this is a pretty old test. I just finished another section from 2004 and was right back to -1...
Anyone else find older tests harder in LR? Not that the sample size is significant in my case.
Old LR? Forum
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 10:51 pm
Re: Old LR?
Older LR is extra wordy. Sometimes im just like "wtf did I just read".
Luckily new LR is more clear and predictable!
Luckily new LR is more clear and predictable!
- pizzabrosauce
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:06 pm
Re: Old LR?
Older LR is quite different, if I do them for too long I find myself switching strategies and reading stimulus first since their premise relationships are so connected.