Bird Game December 2000 LSAT Forum
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
Am I the only one who finds that game really really hard? I think I'm catching onto the pattern of what kind of games require those kind of deductions but man that was hard.
- lsacqueen
- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
If you have any specific questions, I'm sure posters will have an easier time helping you.
- shoulinpandas
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:31 am
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
Last edited by shoulinpandas on Sun May 20, 2012 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 2:32 pm
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
This is another prime example of the test unfairly catering to ornithologists.
If you are a Native American ornithologist you have no excuse to not get a 180.
If you are a Native American ornithologist you have no excuse to not get a 180.
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
Yeah.... If someone was never taught how to make the conditional chain though, how would it even be possible to get ANY of those questions right?shoulinpandas wrote:shrikes are always in this god forsaken forest.... the games all bout making a conditional chain
And the one thing that worries me about conditional chains is that I hate to spend time diagramming contrapositives that might not even be included in the chain.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 8:41 pm
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
Here is a good link explaining the bird game http://www.griffonprep.com/Birdgamesolution.htmlDaRascal wrote:
Yeah.... If someone was never taught how to make the conditional chain though, how would it even be possible to get ANY of those questions right?
Also, you generally will use all the rules and their contrapositives, because the chain itself will have a contrapositve. Nonetheless, drawing contrapositives should be something you practice until you can do it so quickly that the time it takes is meaningless. They happen too often in games and in logical reasoning for this to be a concern.DaRascal wrote:And the one thing that worries me about conditional chains is that I hate to spend time diagramming contrapositives that might not even be included in the chain.
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: Bird Game December 2000 LSAT
I had this game(Prep33) today.
Chain is a good way to solve this game, but you don't need to make this chain.
1. Organize all rules
1) H --> Not G
G --> Not H
2) J or M --> H
Not H --> Not J AND Not M
3) W --> G
Not G --> Not W
4) Not J --> S
Not S --> J
2. Make 2 groups (Selection / Not Selection)
3. Put J/S in Selection group (J or S-or both-should be selected-Inference from Rule 4)
4. Put H/G in Not Selection group (H or G or both should NOT be selected-Inference from Rule 1)
That's it...
Also, whenever you have a question, make use of Manhattan LSAT forum...it's awesome!!
Chain is a good way to solve this game, but you don't need to make this chain.
1. Organize all rules
1) H --> Not G
G --> Not H
2) J or M --> H
Not H --> Not J AND Not M
3) W --> G
Not G --> Not W
4) Not J --> S
Not S --> J
2. Make 2 groups (Selection / Not Selection)
3. Put J/S in Selection group (J or S-or both-should be selected-Inference from Rule 4)
4. Put H/G in Not Selection group (H or G or both should NOT be selected-Inference from Rule 1)
That's it...
Also, whenever you have a question, make use of Manhattan LSAT forum...it's awesome!!