February 2012 Waiting Thread (NEW POLL!!!1!) Forum
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
That ain't niceRodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Why? Everyone has different expectations. And I really need a 170+ to make sure I get into top 5 and have a decent shot at top 3.bernaldiaz wrote:That ain't niceRodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- pancakelover
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:36 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I don't think it was your expectation that's a turn-off... it's the fact that you said "ewww" to put down someone else. Please keep those negative energy thoughts to yourself.
With that said, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict 171 as well, but am really hoping for 173+
With that said, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict 171 as well, but am really hoping for 173+
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Oh sorry I meant the eww for me not him.. why would I say eww to him or his expectations? Expecting a 170+ when I have a feeling it won't happen is ew.pancakelover wrote:I don't think it was your expectation that's a turn-off... it's the fact that you said "ewww" to put down someone else. Please keep those negative energy thoughts to yourself.
With that said, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict 171 as well, but am really hoping for 173+
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
No offense taken. I just can't deliver on test day. I'm more than capable of upper 160s. probably ceiling at 170. I just want to improve.RodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Also, part of my issue in confidence is that I could have sworn I had a 166 or 167 on the last test. Came back a 160
- MConchis
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 3:31 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
RR, were you bullied in middle school?RodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Yea that happens to everyone. Sometimes I think I did poorly on a PT but get high 160s. Then I think I did well but get low 160s. The 171 and 172 that I got on the PTs I didn't think I did particularly well after I finished. It's weird. The trick it to learn the tricks of each section. LR is just learning how the questions are written and you get to a point where you can eliminate answers based on the way they're written and can even get the right answer and know it's 100% right without even knowing how it completely affects the stimulus. The games is just practice. People spend too much time on the set up worrying about inferences. Trick is to just spend ~2.5 minutes on reading and setting up and then moving on to the questions. RC... I dunno that one. I just read and answer the questions. Making too many markings and underlining too much can mess you up so limit it to only weird words you see that you normally don't see or main point sentences.. Once you learn the tricks to every section, it's like doing basic math... like 4+6 = ?noleknight16 wrote:Also, part of my issue in confidence is that I could have sworn I had a 166 or 167 on the last test. Came back a 160
Last edited by RodionRaskolnikov on Thu Mar 01, 2012 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
No, why?MConchis wrote:RR, were you bullied in middle school?RodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Seriously, then I love his response when I told him that it was a mean thing to say.MConchis wrote:RR, were you bullied in middle school?RodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
"But everyone has their own expectations"
- noleknight16
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 3:09 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I wasn't offended. I realize 163 is chump shit compared to most people here.
I have some extremely close big law connections though. A T-14 isn't really a necessity for me to get biglaw. It'd be nice for the prestige, but I'll be fine
I have some extremely close big law connections though. A T-14 isn't really a necessity for me to get biglaw. It'd be nice for the prestige, but I'll be fine
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
I Lol'd, this face was built for people like RR.bernaldiaz wrote:Seriously, then I love his response when I told him that it was a mean thing to say.MConchis wrote:RR, were you bullied in middle school?RodionRaskolnikov wrote:eww I'm hoping so much for a 170+ ...noleknight16 wrote:157, 160, ????
I'd take a 163+ and be perfectly happy
"But everyone has their own expectations"
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Funny, because it matches your avatar picture.I Lol'd, this face was built for people like RR.
- PrincetonBound
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:35 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
For some reason 169 keeps popping into my head. 2 point improvement might help me off some waitlists, but if it's higher I'll probably reapply next cycle.
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
this advice is mediocre on it's absolute best day and he's already taken the test...... SMHRodionRaskolnikov wrote:Yea that happens to everyone. Sometimes I think I did poorly on a PT but get high 160s. Then I think I did well but get low 160s. The 171 and 172 that I got on the PTs I didn't think I did particularly well after I finished. It's weird. The trick it to learn the tricks of each section. LR is just learning how the questions are written and you get to a point where you can eliminate answers based on the way they're written and can even get the right answer and know it's 100% right without even knowing how it completely affects the stimulus. The games is just practice. People spend too much time on the set up worrying about inferences. Trick is to just spend ~2.5 minutes on reading and setting up and then moving on to the questions. RC... I dunno that one. I just read and answer the questions. Making too many markings and underlining too much can mess you up so limit it to only weird words you see that you normally don't see or main point sentences.. Once you learn the tricks to every section, it's like doing basic math... like 4+6 = ?noleknight16 wrote:Also, part of my issue in confidence is that I could have sworn I had a 166 or 167 on the last test. Came back a 160
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Lol I bet your LSAT score is barely 167. That's why you're mad when you saw me expecting/aiming at 170+.anteater1 wrote:this advice is mediocre on it's absolute best day and he's already taken the test...... SMHRodionRaskolnikov wrote:Yea that happens to everyone. Sometimes I think I did poorly on a PT but get high 160s. Then I think I did well but get low 160s. The 171 and 172 that I got on the PTs I didn't think I did particularly well after I finished. It's weird. The trick it to learn the tricks of each section. LR is just learning how the questions are written and you get to a point where you can eliminate answers based on the way they're written and can even get the right answer and know it's 100% right without even knowing how it completely affects the stimulus. The games is just practice. People spend too much time on the set up worrying about inferences. Trick is to just spend ~2.5 minutes on reading and setting up and then moving on to the questions. RC... I dunno that one. I just read and answer the questions. Making too many markings and underlining too much can mess you up so limit it to only weird words you see that you normally don't see or main point sentences.. Once you learn the tricks to every section, it's like doing basic math... like 4+6 = ?noleknight16 wrote:Also, part of my issue in confidence is that I could have sworn I had a 166 or 167 on the last test. Came back a 160
- 941law
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
is dexter on netflix? also, really cheesy show but The Defenders.bernaldiaz wrote:Someone recommend something good to watch to burn the time. Preferably either on Netflix streaming or Hulu. Would love to get into a series. I've already watched all of Dexter, Breaking Bad, Archer, and probably a couple of other shows on Netflix, but if you have anything else, shoot!
Last edited by 941law on Fri Mar 02, 2012 12:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.RodionRaskolnikov wrote:Lol I bet your LSAT score is barely 167. That's why you're mad when you saw me expecting/aiming at 170+.anteater1 wrote:this advice is mediocre on it's absolute best day and he's already taken the test...... SMHRodionRaskolnikov wrote:Yea that happens to everyone. Sometimes I think I did poorly on a PT but get high 160s. Then I think I did well but get low 160s. The 171 and 172 that I got on the PTs I didn't think I did particularly well after I finished. It's weird. The trick it to learn the tricks of each section. LR is just learning how the questions are written and you get to a point where you can eliminate answers based on the way they're written and can even get the right answer and know it's 100% right without even knowing how it completely affects the stimulus. The games is just practice. People spend too much time on the set up worrying about inferences. Trick is to just spend ~2.5 minutes on reading and setting up and then moving on to the questions. RC... I dunno that one. I just read and answer the questions. Making too many markings and underlining too much can mess you up so limit it to only weird words you see that you normally don't see or main point sentences.. Once you learn the tricks to every section, it's like doing basic math... like 4+6 = ?noleknight16 wrote:Also, part of my issue in confidence is that I could have sworn I had a 166 or 167 on the last test. Came back a 160
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
180. Beat it.Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
They used to have a couple seasons but I've watched it since season 1 so I've never watched in on Netflix941law wrote:is dexter on netflix? also, really cheesy show but The Defenders.bernaldiaz wrote:Someone recommend something good to watch to burn the time. Preferably either on Netflix streaming or Hulu. Would love to get into a series. I've already watched all of Dexter, Breaking Bad, Archer, and probably a couple of other shows on Netflix, but if you have anything else, shoot!
- anteater1
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Put your money where your mouth is little buddy.RodionRaskolnikov wrote:180. Beat it.Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
This is getting good. My money is on Anteater over RR, and my money is on me out of the lot to smoke both of you fools!RodionRaskolnikov wrote:180. Beat it.Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.
Just kidding 180's for everyone!
But honestly RR that "180. Beat it." was a major Herp Derp response. He wasn't saying to name any score and he would beat it, he was saying name any amount of money that he beats your score.
- RodionRaskolnikov
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:52 pm
Re: February 2012 Waiting Thread
Lol you can't beat 180. That's a perfect score. Who do you think you are - Elle Woods?anteater1 wrote:Put your money where your mouth is little buddy.RodionRaskolnikov wrote:180. Beat it.Lol you're funny bro the 171 and 172 you got on tests? Thats my average, and I've hit 175+ on multiple occasions. Remember how I said I used to be a pro poker player? Name your price and ill guarantee that I beat your score chump.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login