PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation Forum
- TIKITEMBO

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
Alright, I've got a question with interpreting two rules together for the third game on PT 61.
3. ~U-->R2 (contra: ~R2-->U)
4. R2-->~U (contra: U-->~R2)
How do these work together?
Thanks!
3. ~U-->R2 (contra: ~R2-->U)
4. R2-->~U (contra: U-->~R2)
How do these work together?
Thanks!
- chewdak

- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
What you have is correct.TIKITEMBO wrote:Alright, I've got a question with interpreting two rules together for the third game on PT 61.
3. ~U-->R2 (contra: ~R2-->U)
4. R2-->~U (contra: U-->~R2)
How do these work together?
Thanks!
You could chain them but that would just look confusing to me.
What is your concern about how they would work together?
- lovejopd

- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
You can use a double arrow if you want. It functions as a block but it does not have to appear.TIKITEMBO wrote:Alright, I've got a question with interpreting two rules together for the third game on PT 61.
3. ~U-->R2 (contra: ~R2-->U)
4. R2-->~U (contra: U-->~R2)
How do these work together?
Thanks!
You can think of only 2 cases
1. Both ~U & R2
2. Neither of them(U & ~R2)
Correct me if I am dead wrong~
- TIKITEMBO

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
Any other thoughts on this? I'm not sure if I'm quit getting it yet...lovejopd wrote:You can use a double arrow if you want. It functions as a block but it does not have to appear.TIKITEMBO wrote:Alright, I've got a question with interpreting two rules together for the third game on PT 61.
3. ~U-->R2 (contra: ~R2-->U)
4. R2-->~U (contra: U-->~R2)
How do these work together?
Thanks!
You can think of only 2 cases
1. Both ~U & R2
2. Neither of them(U & ~R2)
Correct me if I am dead wrong~
Thanks for the responses.
- chewdak

- Posts: 106
- Joined: Fri Apr 03, 2009 5:54 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
I don't know if there is anything to 'get'.TIKITEMBO wrote: Any other thoughts on this? I'm not sure if I'm quit getting it yet...
Thanks for the responses.
Do you understand these rules?
The game revolves around the fact that 4 out 5 individuals will participate, other rules introduce some additional
constraints regarding order and who is in and who is out.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TIKITEMBO

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
chewdak wrote:I don't know if there is anything to 'get'.TIKITEMBO wrote: Any other thoughts on this? I'm not sure if I'm quit getting it yet...
Thanks for the responses.
Do you understand these rules?
The game revolves around the fact that 4 out 5 individuals will participate, other rules introduce some additional
constraints regarding order and who is in and who is out.
I understand these rules, but I'm trying to figure out how the work together. Or, if they do at all.
- TIKITEMBO

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
Seriously, if anyone knows how to do this. I am terrified this will be on the test tomorrow and ruin a game.
- lovejopd

- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
Do you remember the phrase "A if and only if B" in LR? It is the same logic used in Game.TIKITEMBO wrote:chewdak wrote:I don't know if there is anything to 'get'.TIKITEMBO wrote: Any other thoughts on this? I'm not sure if I'm quit getting it yet...
Thanks for the responses.
Do you understand these rules?
The game revolves around the fact that 4 out 5 individuals will participate, other rules introduce some additional
constraints regarding order and who is in and who is out.
I understand these rules, but I'm trying to figure out how the work together. Or, if they do at all.
A <--> B
: A --> B (A only if B)
+
B --> A (A if B)
See what I am saying?
Only two scenarios can occur I said before
1) A and B (It does not matter A appear or B appear first)
or
2) Nothing
Do not worry too much about it and calm down. You will be okay.
P.S. Don't forget: Reverse Splitter Unite! Hope you get the score you want tomorrow~and have a nice sleep today
- TIKITEMBO

- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: PT 61 LG Rule Interpretation
Aw thanks. I appreciate it. And yes, Reverse Splitters unite! I actually just re-did the game and felt a lot better about it. It is how you put it, but I think you can look at it kind of piece-meal too (checking each rule). It works better your way though. Thanks for the help and if you're taking it tomorrow, good luck!