Thank You VelocityLSAT!!! Forum

[flat-fifth]

After just one week of using Velocity's games training, I've seen a HUGE increase in my ability to understand and work through games. I'm still making some stupid mistakes, but the light in my brain has definitely been turned on. The program falls in line with what I've read on TLS(repetition, repetition, repetition!!). However, watching someone work the games and explain them is a tremendous help. I just wanted to offer public thanks because a few days ago I was TOTALLY lost.

[BlueDiamond]

go away

[MrPapagiorgio]

Yay another advertisement

[071816]

[it'sjustme]

I don't think this one is a troll.

S(he) has made posts in the past indicating his/her problems with logic games, and was seeking ways to improve.

[Mal Reynolds]

You're better than this Dave.

[glucose101]

I can completely vouch for VelocityLSAT, esp their games. Dave gives you a system to work with that makes the games a breeze (I was already scoring -0 already, but his system is so mechanical and quick, that it gave me even more time).

[flat-fifth]

I don't think this one is a troll.

S(he) has made posts in the past indicating his/her problems with logic games, and was seeking ways to improve.

No troll here. Just an extremely thankful noob. I never would've discovered this without TLS.

[penguinbrah]

i don't think it's a troll either... i've recently signed up for velocity.. got my books last week.. and i'm already loving the way the games are taught - it's just so much easier to understand for some reason.

A light also went off in my head for main conclusion questions and now they are all of a sudden a breeze for me. Same with Conditional reasoning - I used to have trouble diagramming it in lengthy LR questions but now I'm having an easier time.

My only problem right now is inference questions - I just can't seem to improve on these. I keep getting them wrong while I'm drilling them.

edit: i get the inference questions with conditional reasoning right because I can diagram it.. but the questions that are "most strongly supported" and don't have conditional reasoning I get them wrong... wtf man

[rbkl]

Give us some numbers? What was your diagnostic? What level are you at now?

[penguinbrah]

Give us some numbers? What was your diagnostic? What level are you at now?

cold diagnostic was 151. Just re-took the December LSAT which I cancelled the score for and sadly got a 154.

Started Velocity but I haven't taken another PT yet. Once I do take a PT I will post what I get.