accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator? Forum
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
Hello,
One of LR Question needs a diagram, but I am not familiar with how the word 'accompany' works in a conditional statement.
All immoral actions 'are accompanied by' feelings of guilt.
Should I diagram IAction --> Fguilty?
If the statement was feelings of guilt accompany immoral actions, should I diagram differently?
Please clarify on this Accompany Thank you!
One of LR Question needs a diagram, but I am not familiar with how the word 'accompany' works in a conditional statement.
All immoral actions 'are accompanied by' feelings of guilt.
Should I diagram IAction --> Fguilty?
If the statement was feelings of guilt accompany immoral actions, should I diagram differently?
Please clarify on this Accompany Thank you!
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 5:26 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
Do not diagram differently. The different wording makes the two statements logically equivalent. It's like when an "if a, then b" is turned into "b only if a." In both cases, the "b" is dependent on "a." In both of your example statements, feelings of guilt are dependent on immoral actions. Focus on which is dependent on the other, not on wording order or anything else.lovejopd wrote:Hello,
One of LR Question needs a diagram, but I am not familiar with how the word 'accompany' works in a conditional statement.
All immoral actions 'are accompanied by' feelings of guilt.
Should I diagram IAction --> Fguilty?
If the statement was feelings of guilt accompany immoral actions, should I diagram differently?
Please clarify on this Accompany Thank you!
- bgdddymtty
- Posts: 696
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 12:59 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
Fixed.Nate895 wrote:It's like when an "if a, then b" is turned into "bonlyif a."
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
the same both ways
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
so,
A "is accompanied by" B = Requires, Needs, depends on
: A --> B
B "Accompany" A = is required, is needed, is dependent on
: A --> B
Correct?
A little bit weired grammatically...maybe I need the better understanding of the word 'accompany' itself though...still confused
A "is accompanied by" B = Requires, Needs, depends on
: A --> B
B "Accompany" A = is required, is needed, is dependent on
: A --> B
Correct?
A little bit weired grammatically...maybe I need the better understanding of the word 'accompany' itself though...still confused
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
yeah, a's presence is dependent on b'slovejopd wrote:so,
A "is accompanied by" B = Requires, Needs, depends on
: A --> B
B "Accompany" A = is required, is needed, is dependent on
: A --> B
Correct?
A little bit weired grammatically...maybe I need the better understanding of the word 'accompany' itself though...still confused
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
Thank you so much!!JamMasterJ wrote:yeah, a's presence is dependent on b'slovejopd wrote:so,
A "is accompanied by" B = Requires, Needs, depends on
: A --> B
B "Accompany" A = is required, is needed, is dependent on
: A --> B
Correct?
A little bit weired grammatically...maybe I need the better understanding of the word 'accompany' itself though...still confused
-
- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am
Re: accompany-sufficient or necessary indicator?
I would add to the above that "A accompanies B" and "B is accompanied by A" are the same statement rephrased in the active and passive voices, respectively. Equally, consider "He hit the ball" and "The ball was hit by him." The emphasis might be different, but the meaning is the same.