LG-LR-LG-RC-LR Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
thf5007

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:19 pm

LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by thf5007 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:08 pm

Those with LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. Does anyone not doubt that the first was the experimental?
Top
User avatar
Olive

Silver
Posts: 997
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Olive » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:09 pm

I sincerely hope that the first section was the real deal because I absolutely rocked that section, had time to go over each answer choice twice!

But....I'm guessing it was too easy?
Top
thf5007

New
Posts: 9
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 2:19 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by thf5007 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:10 pm

thats my guess
Top
User avatar
Olive

Silver
Posts: 997
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:23 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Olive » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:13 pm

Going into the second LG, however, I thought the first three games were so easy they had to be experimental. Then by the fourth...things changed.
Top
User avatar
RCinDNA

Bronze
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:14 pm

thf5007 wrote:Those with LG-LR-LG-RC-LR. Does anyone not doubt that the first was the experimental?
I thought experimental sections were usually more difficult?
Top
rth887

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by rth887 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:48 pm

Olive wrote:Going into the second LG, however, I thought the first three games were so easy they had to be experimental. Then by the fourth...things changed.

The first game was one of the easiest ever, IMO.
Top
User avatar
TIKITEMBO

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:49 pm

Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.
Top
rth887

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:01 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by rth887 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:51 pm

TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.
Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.
Top
User avatar
Monte.Cristo

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Monte.Cristo » Sat Dec 03, 2011 5:02 pm

rth887 wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.
Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.
.
Top
User avatar
TIKITEMBO

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:06 pm

Alright, someone without to LG's said they didn't remember having Juice and Snacks. Anyone else heard this?
Top
User avatar
Dawak1

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Dawak1 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:10 pm

The first LG was absolutely the exp one. If you talk to people who only had 1 LG section, and compare the topics, it's clear. I don't know how the rules are here and I dont wanna be banned so my apologies if this post is annoyingly vague.
Top
User avatar
Dawak1

New
Posts: 18
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 6:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Dawak1 » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:10 pm

rth887 wrote:
TIKITEMBO wrote:Oh my god I hope the first was experimental. Juice and snacks...christ.
Same here. The flow, phrasing, and questions all seemed off.
Agreed.
Top
User avatar
TIKITEMBO

Silver
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by TIKITEMBO » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:14 pm

No that's cool and thanks that's a relief. I think that's exactly what we're allowed. Don't want to be too specific because it's not released, copyright, etc.
Top
User avatar
RCinDNA

Bronze
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:15 pm

Dawak1 wrote:The first LG was absolutely the exp one. If you talk to people who only had 1 LG section, and compare the topics, it's clear. I don't know how the rules are here and I dont wanna be banned so my apologies if this post is annoyingly vague.
I tend to scan the games for the ones that I'm best at, so I might have passed over the juice and snacks one. Is the consensus that the the LG section with the scheduling aspect was the actual credited section?
Top
User avatar
Roza P

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:20 pm

Hot foods. I'm pretty sure we're allowed to say hot foods eh?
Top
JDProspect

New
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:49 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by JDProspect » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:22 pm

I don't even remember the contents on them, its just a blur. I just hope LG1 was my experimental
Top
seahorsesmusic

New
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by seahorsesmusic » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:22 pm

Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.
Top
User avatar
Roza P

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:25 pm

With that said. What the fuck man. Why was the first section so easy? I'm sitting here in utter confusion. I did absolutely terrible in Oct, and thought I would kill Dec. I don't feel confident after hearing this. I changed up my strat and I'm not sure what to do or expect now... I'm flying up north to visit some schools next week... fuckkkkk
Top
User avatar
RCinDNA

Bronze
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 1:55 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by RCinDNA » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:26 pm

seahorsesmusic wrote:Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.
Same. I figured LG/Sec 3 was experimental because TV schedules felt weird. For once, I blazed through LG/Sec 1 so I was hopeful for mercy. Alas, the LSAT gods care naught for mercy.
Top
User avatar
Roza P

New
Posts: 24
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Roza P » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:28 pm

RCinDNA wrote:
seahorsesmusic wrote:Hot foods. Scheduling. Definitely.

Bummer. I left section 1 feeling great.
Same. I figured LG/Sec 3 was experimental because TV schedules felt weird. For once, I blazed through LG/Sec 1 so I was hopeful for mercy. Alas, the LSAT gods care naught for mercy.
they will never
Top
User avatar
Ohiobumpkin

Silver
Posts: 564
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:50 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Ohiobumpkin » Sun Dec 04, 2011 2:01 am

The first section was experimental. 100% positive.
Top
User avatar
lsacqueen

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by lsacqueen » Sun Dec 04, 2011 4:03 am

Ohiobumpkin wrote:The first section was experimental. 100% positive.

This has been established on numerous threads.. Oh, the redundancy. :roll:
Top
Azmatt

Bronze
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Azmatt » Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:25 am

Was it? Can we consider the possibility that people have two LG might have their order switched as well?


I'm almost assured that tv blocks is something I can ignore.
Top
User avatar
lsacqueen

Bronze
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by lsacqueen » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:09 pm

Does anyone remember how many questions the TV game had? Hopefully I'm allowed to ask that... If not, mods, let me know and I'll take it down.
Top
User avatar
Monte.Cristo

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:57 pm

Re: LG-LR-LG-RC-LR

Post by Monte.Cristo » Sun Dec 04, 2011 8:17 pm

Azmatt wrote:Was it? Can we consider the possibility that people have two LG might have their order switched as well?


I'm almost assured that tv blocks is something I can ignore.
Huh? I thought the section containing the TV blocks (which was the second LG section) was the real one, and that the first LG section was the experimental one...

I also thought that the TV blocks was the experimental... :cry:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”