RC LR LG RC LR Forum
- dietcoke0
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:46 pm
RC LR LG RC LR
Second RC experimental? Hope so.
- dietcoke0
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
- dietcoke0
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I guess any non RC experimental, you have Blackmail?
-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 8:19 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dietcoke0
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:46 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I agree, and wanted to ask everyone around me walking to the train, but didn't have the guts.stephinmd wrote:Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 1:39 am
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Had the same format... Wish that the 2nd was experimental, but I highly doubt it 

-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 10:18 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
First RC was experimental
- TIKITEMBO
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 5:07 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Did you all have Juice and Snacks in the games? I had two LG sections.
- fashiongirl
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:30 am
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
2nd RC blackmail was experimental. I was HOPING the other one was experimental. The 4th RC passage in the scored section sucked for me.
- wolf
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:09 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Blackmail / Latina Autobiographies / Land Plot New Topsoil was real bro. I only had one RCfashiongirl wrote:2nd RC blackmail was experimental. I was HOPING the other one was experimental. The 4th RC passage in the scored section sucked for me.
- fashiongirl
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:30 am
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Oh yeah. That's what I meant. Idk why I put blackmail was exp...I guess I really hated that one. Also I meant the 5th RC (my 2nd RC, the scored one) sucked for me. I must have been in LSAT hungover-ness.
Anyway the scored RC effing killed me. It was my last section too so I was so mad that I got another RC, i wasted about 6 mins rereading the last passage (started with that one) which turned out to be the hardest and so I didn't have enough time to finish the comparative since I did that one last.
Anyway the scored RC effing killed me. It was my last section too so I was so mad that I got another RC, i wasted about 6 mins rereading the last passage (started with that one) which turned out to be the hardest and so I didn't have enough time to finish the comparative since I did that one last.
- CorkBoard
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 6:05 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
This sounds like what I did...did the first two, then the 4th, and then I had to skim the comparative. Blargh.fashiongirl wrote:Oh yeah. That's what I meant. Idk why I put blackmail was exp...I guess I really hated that one. Also I meant the 5th RC (my 2nd RC, the scored one) sucked for me. I must have been in LSAT hungover-ness.
Anyway the scored RC effing killed me. It was my last section too so I was so mad that I got another RC, i wasted about 6 mins rereading the last passage (started with that one) which turned out to be the hardest and so I didn't have enough time to finish the comparative since I did that one last.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ColumbiaChamp
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I want to take an LSAT with the exprimental RC from this test sometime in the future, oh that would be nice. did y'all have hapiness & wealth comparative as the exp RC?
- Yardbird
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
My experimental had commissioning art as humanities and negative evidence as comparative/science...can't remember the other two. All I remember was my experimental reading comp was hard unlike what most people are saying about theirs. About equal difficulty between my two RC sections (I averaged -2 to -3 over 30 PTs)ColumbiaChamp wrote:I want to take an LSAT with the exprimental RC from this test sometime in the future, oh that would be nice. did y'all have hapiness & wealth comparative as the exp RC?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I'm almost 100% sure they don't do thisstephinmd wrote:Could LSAC also switch around the ordering of the passages within a section from one version to the next? They're sneaky.dietcoke0 wrote:I dunno, the first RC on the first section did not spill over into a second column. I noticed the guy next to me, at the fifth section RC his first section did not spill over into a second section (he was borrowing my sharpen at the beginning of the section, so I noticed it then.) Or maybe he just didn't have it turned to the first RC passage right away.
- Yardbird
- Posts: 1156
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
after rereading the posts above, it seems there are more than 1 experimental RC section that were given in the RC-LR-LG-RC-LR format.
So far there are:
1) Wealth comparative
2) Negative evidence comparative
Actual) Blackmail comparative
Anyone else have any others?
[Edit] Grammar
So far there are:
1) Wealth comparative
2) Negative evidence comparative
Actual) Blackmail comparative
Anyone else have any others?
[Edit] Grammar
Last edited by Yardbird on Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- cerealnmilk
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 2:54 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
I pray to sweet baby he-zeus that this was the experimental RC. The proctor must've roofied me. I have a vague recollection of the comparative science one, but otherwise I cannot remember answering any of those questions.My experimental had commissioning art as humanities and negative evidence as comparative/science...can't remember the other two. All I remember was my experimental reading comp was hard unlike what most people are saying about theirs. About equal difficulty between my two RC sections (I averaged -2 to -3 over 30 PTs)
- fashiongirl
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:30 am
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Adding to this -
So far there are:
1) Wealth (i dont remember?)
2) Negative evidence comparative
3) Art
Actual
1) Archiving I THINK
1) Blackmail comparative
2) Latina writers
3) Topsoil
Everything is all a blur. I can't believe I got cursed with 2 RCs. I'm just glad they weren't back to back.
So far there are:
1) Wealth (i dont remember?)
2) Negative evidence comparative
3) Art
Actual
1) Archiving I THINK
1) Blackmail comparative
2) Latina writers
3) Topsoil
Everything is all a blur. I can't believe I got cursed with 2 RCs. I'm just glad they weren't back to back.
- SublimeStyle
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2011 4:42 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
The actual RC was the second one if you had two. I was wishing the first one was real (The one that started with the black mexican sculptor lady) since that one was much easier.
- jeremydc
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2010 4:13 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Was the first rc like 27 questions, if so I ended up guessing on the final 4, please let it be the experimental!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ColumbiaChamp
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
they were both 27 questions. real had archives, latinas, blackmail, topsoil.jeremydc wrote:Was the first rc like 27 questions, if so I ended up guessing on the final 4, please let it be the experimental!
- princeR
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm
Re: RC LR LG RC LR
Can someone who felt comfortable with the RC (real one) please tell me you put a lot of D's for the last passage (soil), I ended up guessing on almost all of them...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login